摘要
法律普遍主义以理性化为基础,提出了判断何谓"真正的"法律的普遍标准,而法律多元主义以历史和文化为基础,主张对法律的多元化表达。法律普遍主义的典型代表法律东方主义是建立在将东方,尤其是中国的法律作为异化的他者来加以反思的思维方式之上的,本质上不过是一种话语构成,而且将会导致人类社会文化价值的量化、世俗化和理性化;而法律多元主义体现了真正的普遍性与同一性,因此比法律普遍主义更有价值。法律多元主义的代表东方法律主义主张通过建立以中国为中心的法律观重构关于中国法的叙事,这种叙事体现为一种普遍—多元主义的结构,以法律统一化为实现机制。
The legal universalism proposes universal criteria for judging the"real"law on the basis of rationalization,however,the legal pluralism advocates the diverse expressions of laws on the basis of history and culture.In fact,legal universalism,which is based on the thinking of taking the eastern laws,especially China’s law as an alienated other,is a sort of discursive construction and will lead the cultural values of human societies into quantization,secularization and rationalization.On the other hand,the legal pluralism represents the real universalism and identity,therefore it is more valuable.Oriental legalism,which is a representative of legal pluralism,suggests the reconstruction of China’s law narration through the establishment of China-centered legal thought,this narration is embodied in a universal-pluralist structure and uses the unification of laws as the realizing mechanism.
出处
《现代法治研究》
2020年第4期91-102,共12页
Journal of Modern Rule of Law
作者简介
周维明,中国应用法学研究所助理研究员,法学博士。
