摘要
清末中国与邻国越南和缅甸在同一历史时期分别各有一次划界,中越划界时中国提出“去瓯脱以争界”,中国委员坚持“先改后勘”,获得成功;而中缅划界时中国采取“存瓯脱以分地”,故而提出要求中缅两国“以势定界”,反却失败。瓯脱实质即是两国领土之间之中间地带,在国家边界采以线型边界线之后,这类中间地带逐渐消失。相邻国家间在划分这类中间地带时,国际法先占理论起着重要的作用。清末中缅、中越两次划界中,中国委员对于国际法的各自认识以及“瓯脱”与“先占”理论的不同运用,最终影响了中缅、中越的划界结果。
There are Sino-Myanmar and Sino-Vietnam demarcations separately in thesame historical period in the late Qing Dynasty.During demarcation between Chinaand Vietnam,Chinese officials put forward a proposal of“Removing‘No-man’sLand’on Border and Striving for Frontier”,by which China insisted on“Modificationbefore Demarcation”and succeeded.China adopted the policy of“Division of Landon the Base of Retaining‘No-man’s Land’on Border”in Sino-Myanmar demarcation,but failed.“No-man’s Land”on Border is essentially Land of Intermediaries between two neighbouring countries,which gradually disappeared after boundary line was adopted by countries.Occupation of International Law plays an important role individing such Land of Intermediaries.Chinese officials’different understanding of occupation of international law and application of“No-man’s Land”on Border finallyhad a different impact on Sino-Myanmar and Sino-Vietnam delimitation.
基金
西南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助,项目编号:2022SJL07YB
关键词
中缅和中越划界
清末
瓯脱
国际法先占理论
Sino-Myanmar and Sino-Vietnam Demarcation
the Late Qing Dynasty
“No-man’s Land”on Border
Occupation of International Law
作者简介
赵琪,西南民族大学法学院副教授,硕士生导师,国家民委“一带一路”国别和区域研究中心东南亚研究中心研究员,研究方向:国际法学、边疆与边界问题
