摘要
囿于传统反垄断法应对平台市场力量的不足,针对数字经济领域的竞争问题,世界范围内已经形成了改良传统反垄断法、全面的事前规制和持续的机构监管三种路径。作为事前规制路径的典型代表,欧盟《数字市场法》已于2022年11月1日正式生效。通过考察该法出台的主要动因、政策目标和调整机制可以得出启示:中国竞争政策目标设定不仅应关注本国相关市场竞争状况,更应本着国家利益最大化的原则,在中美欧数字博弈的大背景下综合考量;数字竞争政策存在多种路径,应综合权衡个中利弊,结合本国制度基础和市场发展阶段谨慎选择;在数字竞争政策的设定中也应注意与其他数字、数据政策的冲突与协调。
Due to the limitations of the traditional anti-trust law in addressing the market power of large digital platforms,in view of the competition problems in the field of digital economy,three approaches have been formed around the world:improving the traditional anti-trust law,ex ante conduct rules and ongoing agency oversight.As a typical representative of the ex-ante regulation path,the EU Digital Markets Act has officially entered into force on November 1,2022.Through the investigation of the motivation,policy objectives and adjustment mechanism of the Act,we can draw the enlightenment that the setting of China’s competition policy objectives should not only focus on the competition situation of the domestic market,but also take comprehensive consideration in the context of the global digital economy game based on the principle of maximizing national interests.There are many choices of digital competition policy,the advantages and disadvantages should be comprehensively weighed and carefully selected according to the domestic institutional basis and market development stage.When formulating a digital competition policy,attention should also be paid to the conflict and coordination with other relevant policies.
出处
《上海政法学院学报（法治论丛）》
2023年第2期14-31,共18页
Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law(The Rule of Law Forum)
基金
2017年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“反垄断罚款决定的司法审查标准研究”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:17CFX077
作者简介
洪莹莹,法学博士,安徽财经大学法学院副教授。
