摘要
现有理论解读过度美化了公开行政处罚决定的背后动机,公开行政处罚决定并不单单是行政机关“自我监督”的向善举措,不能将其简单理解为公民监督依法行政的一种“权利”。这一“权利”是无法交给行政相对人的,相对人也不可能行使任何选择权限。实际上,行政处罚决定公开更多的是一项规制工具,是作为“权力”赋予行政机关的,是由互联网兴起的时代背景和行政组织法的内生突破共同助长的。作为“权力”的行政处罚决定公开,需要和其他制裁行为一样获得规范化。我们应努力从“权利”视角转换至“权力”视角,改变现有监督依法行政的目的认识,充分运用行政法基本原理,为行政处罚决定公开设置全方位控权机制。与此同时,“权力”视角下的行政处罚决定公开工作,也应做根本性调整,如“具有一定社会影响”的限缩解释、公开无需匿名等等。
The existing theoretical interpretation excessively embellishes the motivation behind the publicity of administrative penalty decisions,which is more than a good move of administrative organs to carry out"self supervision"and cannot be simply understood as a"right"of citizens of supervising administration according to law.This"right"cannot be handed over to administrative counterparts,nor can counterparts exercise any option.In fact,the publicity of administrative penalty decisions is more of a regulatory tool,which is given to administrative organs as"power",and is jointly encouraged by the era background of the rise of the Internet and the endogenous breakthrough of administrative organization law.As"power",the publicity of administrative penalty decisions needs to be governed by norms as other sanctions.We should make efforts to transform the perspective from"right"to"power",change the existing understanding of the purpose of supervising administration according to law,make full use of the basic principles of administrative law to set up an all-round power control mechanism for the publicity of administrative penalty decisions.At the same time,the publicity of administrative penalty decisions from the perspective of"power"should also be fundamentally adjusted,such as the restrictive interpretation of"having a certain social impact",no need for anonymity.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第2期141-159,共19页
Political Science and Law
基金
2019年度国家社科基金青年项目“《行政处罚法》归责性条款修改研究”(项目编号:19CFX023)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
关键词
行政处罚决定公开
目的
制裁
Publicity of Administrative Penalty Decisions
Purpose
Sanction
作者简介
熊樟林,东南大学法学院教授、博士生导师。
