摘要
民法典第七百六十三条规定的虚构债权保理规则是以外观主义理论为基础建构而成的。依据外观主义理论对该规则进行解析,会发现其"应收账款为虚构"及"保理人非明知该应收账款不真实"要件都难以契合外观主义理论的"外观存在"与"相对人合理信赖"要件。我国应当借鉴德日瑞三国的立法模式及虚假债权让与规则,对该条款进行修改,并以其为基础,构建适用各种债权让与行为的虚假债权让与规则。
The factoring rules of fictitious claims in article 763 of the civil code are constructed on the basis of the theory of Rechtsschein Theorie.Based on the theory of Rechtsschein,we can find that its constitutive requirements,that"accounts receivable is fictitious"and"the factorier does not know that the accounts receivable are untrue",are difficult to fit in with the constitutive requirements of"existence of appearance"and"reasonable reliance of relative person"in the theory of Rechtsschein.The government should draw lessons from the legislative model and the rules for the assignment of fictitious creditor’s rights of Germany,Japan and Switzerland,modify such term and construct the rules of fabricated assignment of creditor’s rights applicable to all kinds of assignment of creditor’s rights based on it.
作者
张序正
田思路(指导)
ZHANG Xu-zheng(School of Economic Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处
《华中师范大学研究生学报》
2020年第3期51-55,共5页
Central China Normal University Journal of Postgraduates
关键词
外观主义
比较法
虚构债权保理
theory of Rechtsschein
Comparative Law
factoring rules of fabricated credit
作者简介
张序正(1995-),男,山东济南人,华东政法大学法学院2018级硕士研究生,研究方向为劳动与社会保障法。
