In the historical period of the all-round deepening reform,China has entered a new era of“deepening the practice of governing the country by law”.With the fifth amendment of the Constitution,the legislative power of...In the historical period of the all-round deepening reform,China has entered a new era of“deepening the practice of governing the country by law”.With the fifth amendment of the Constitution,the legislative power of local government has been further confirmed.The expansion of local legislative power has put forward new requirements for the legislative quality,and the pre-legislative evaluation system has thus come into being.The deficiency of the design of the pre-legislative evaluation system in Article 39 of The Legislative Law makes certain problems in the detailed rules of implementation,the subject of evaluation,the object of evaluation and the personnel of the pre-legislative evaluation system in China.Therefore,it is the only way to perfect the pre-legislative evaluation system in China to formulate a national pre-legislative evaluation implementation rules,define the subject of third-party evaluation,determine the scope of evaluation objects and select the suitable evaluation personnel.展开更多
在科技创新快速迭代的背景下,开展负责任研究与创新(responsible research and innovation,RRI)能够预防人类跌入科技“进步陷阱”。运用制度语法学工具,廓析中央政府制定的42项RRI政策的制度轮廓,并结合目标群体社会建构与政策设计框...在科技创新快速迭代的背景下,开展负责任研究与创新(responsible research and innovation,RRI)能够预防人类跌入科技“进步陷阱”。运用制度语法学工具,廓析中央政府制定的42项RRI政策的制度轮廓,并结合目标群体社会建构与政策设计框架解析政策的规制机理。研究发现:我国政府日益重视RRI,并试图在政策设计中激发政策目标群体开展RRI的内生动力,但现有政策整体呈弱规制性,政策的贯彻落实需要多元主体配合。从制度规则的应用来看,制度规则在生物医药和人工智能这些科技发展迅猛的领域应用最多。具体而言,选择规则是政策设计中最常使用的规则类型,而其余6种制度规则的应用不充分。进一步解析政策规制机理发现,在规制类型上,通过建构优势者、依赖者、偏离者3种目标群体,打造出政策规制差序格局;在规制手段上,巧用框定、强化、修辞话语策略建构目标群体,构建出RRI框架;在规制强度上,开展宪法选择层、集体选择层、操作选择层目标群体社会建构,凝聚出政策规制强大合力。研究结论在理论方面为学者研究RRI议题提供了政策视角启示,在实践方面为学者研究RRI政策提供了制度语法学工具的方法论见解,也为我国政府更好地设计和完善RRI政策提供了理论参考,助力我国政府提升科技治理水平。展开更多
基金This article is the initial result of the 2017 general planning project of philosophy and social science of Guizhou Provincial Department of Education——“Study on Guizhou Local Legislative Evaluation System”(Project Number:2017GH15)the 2018 youth fund project of humanities and social sciences research of the Ministry of Education—“Study on the Value Conflicts in the Implementation of the Constitution and Its Settlement Mechanism”(Project Number:18YJC820039)
文摘In the historical period of the all-round deepening reform,China has entered a new era of“deepening the practice of governing the country by law”.With the fifth amendment of the Constitution,the legislative power of local government has been further confirmed.The expansion of local legislative power has put forward new requirements for the legislative quality,and the pre-legislative evaluation system has thus come into being.The deficiency of the design of the pre-legislative evaluation system in Article 39 of The Legislative Law makes certain problems in the detailed rules of implementation,the subject of evaluation,the object of evaluation and the personnel of the pre-legislative evaluation system in China.Therefore,it is the only way to perfect the pre-legislative evaluation system in China to formulate a national pre-legislative evaluation implementation rules,define the subject of third-party evaluation,determine the scope of evaluation objects and select the suitable evaluation personnel.
文摘在科技创新快速迭代的背景下,开展负责任研究与创新(responsible research and innovation,RRI)能够预防人类跌入科技“进步陷阱”。运用制度语法学工具,廓析中央政府制定的42项RRI政策的制度轮廓,并结合目标群体社会建构与政策设计框架解析政策的规制机理。研究发现:我国政府日益重视RRI,并试图在政策设计中激发政策目标群体开展RRI的内生动力,但现有政策整体呈弱规制性,政策的贯彻落实需要多元主体配合。从制度规则的应用来看,制度规则在生物医药和人工智能这些科技发展迅猛的领域应用最多。具体而言,选择规则是政策设计中最常使用的规则类型,而其余6种制度规则的应用不充分。进一步解析政策规制机理发现,在规制类型上,通过建构优势者、依赖者、偏离者3种目标群体,打造出政策规制差序格局;在规制手段上,巧用框定、强化、修辞话语策略建构目标群体,构建出RRI框架;在规制强度上,开展宪法选择层、集体选择层、操作选择层目标群体社会建构,凝聚出政策规制强大合力。研究结论在理论方面为学者研究RRI议题提供了政策视角启示,在实践方面为学者研究RRI政策提供了制度语法学工具的方法论见解,也为我国政府更好地设计和完善RRI政策提供了理论参考,助力我国政府提升科技治理水平。
