Objective The aims of this study were to describe nursing students′self-directed learning readiness and social problem solving and test their correlations in Macao.Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study was c...Objective The aims of this study were to describe nursing students′self-directed learning readiness and social problem solving and test their correlations in Macao.Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 140baccalaureate nursing students.A stratified random sampling was performed.The Self-directed Learning Readiness(SDLR)Scale and Chinese Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised(C-SPSI-R)were used.Results The response rate was 79.3%.Students possessed readiness for self-directed learning(mean 149.09±12.53,51.4%at high level,48.6%at low level).Regarding to social problem solving,the mean scores of each subscale were 9.35±3.25(Rational Problem Solving,RPS),10.26±3.23(Positive Problem Orientation,PPO),8.14±4.06(Negative Problem Orientation,NPO),5.67±4.44(Avoidance Style,AS),and 4.84±3.03(Impulsivity/Carelessness Style,ICS).SDLR was positively related to RPS and PPO,but was negatively related to AS.Conclusion Half of students possessed stronger readiness for self-directed learning.Students had a belief in the ability to solve problems,and adopted relevant strategies in solving problems.However,students still had negative and dysfunctional orientation and defective attempts in solving problems.Self-directed learning was positively related to positive and constructive orientation,but was negatively related to defective problem-solving pattern.Nurse educators should create educational climates for promoting student confidence and mutual responsibility for learning and their thinking process for problem solving.展开更多
针对消防设施选址问题,构建考虑时效性、市民等待救援的焦急心理和建设成本的三目标消防设施选址模型,以实现更科学的消防设施布局。鉴于该问题的NP难特性,提出基于算子学习的多目标深度强化学习模型(multi-objective deep reinforcemen...针对消防设施选址问题,构建考虑时效性、市民等待救援的焦急心理和建设成本的三目标消防设施选址模型,以实现更科学的消防设施布局。鉴于该问题的NP难特性,提出基于算子学习的多目标深度强化学习模型(multi-objective deep reinforcement learning,MDRL)。设计多种优化算子作为强化学习的动作空间,训练策略网络以选择最佳优化算子来改进解决方案。针对多目标问题,设计基于优势差异的方法(MDRL-AD)和基于支配性评估的方法(MDRL-DE)。采用四种规模的测试算例及实际案例进行数值实验,将MDRL和改进的NSGA-Ⅱ、MOPSO、L2I算法进行比较,并利用Hypervolume指标、Spacing指标、Ω指标、IGD指标对算法性能进行评估。实验结果表明,MDRL-AD方法更适用于求解小规模算例,MDRL-DE方法则在求解大规模和超大规模算例时相比其他算法优势明显。MDRL在非劣解集的收敛性和均匀性方面明显优于其他对比算法,为消防设施布局规划提供了一种有竞争力的解决方案。展开更多
文摘Objective The aims of this study were to describe nursing students′self-directed learning readiness and social problem solving and test their correlations in Macao.Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 140baccalaureate nursing students.A stratified random sampling was performed.The Self-directed Learning Readiness(SDLR)Scale and Chinese Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised(C-SPSI-R)were used.Results The response rate was 79.3%.Students possessed readiness for self-directed learning(mean 149.09±12.53,51.4%at high level,48.6%at low level).Regarding to social problem solving,the mean scores of each subscale were 9.35±3.25(Rational Problem Solving,RPS),10.26±3.23(Positive Problem Orientation,PPO),8.14±4.06(Negative Problem Orientation,NPO),5.67±4.44(Avoidance Style,AS),and 4.84±3.03(Impulsivity/Carelessness Style,ICS).SDLR was positively related to RPS and PPO,but was negatively related to AS.Conclusion Half of students possessed stronger readiness for self-directed learning.Students had a belief in the ability to solve problems,and adopted relevant strategies in solving problems.However,students still had negative and dysfunctional orientation and defective attempts in solving problems.Self-directed learning was positively related to positive and constructive orientation,but was negatively related to defective problem-solving pattern.Nurse educators should create educational climates for promoting student confidence and mutual responsibility for learning and their thinking process for problem solving.
文摘针对消防设施选址问题,构建考虑时效性、市民等待救援的焦急心理和建设成本的三目标消防设施选址模型,以实现更科学的消防设施布局。鉴于该问题的NP难特性,提出基于算子学习的多目标深度强化学习模型(multi-objective deep reinforcement learning,MDRL)。设计多种优化算子作为强化学习的动作空间,训练策略网络以选择最佳优化算子来改进解决方案。针对多目标问题,设计基于优势差异的方法(MDRL-AD)和基于支配性评估的方法(MDRL-DE)。采用四种规模的测试算例及实际案例进行数值实验,将MDRL和改进的NSGA-Ⅱ、MOPSO、L2I算法进行比较,并利用Hypervolume指标、Spacing指标、Ω指标、IGD指标对算法性能进行评估。实验结果表明,MDRL-AD方法更适用于求解小规模算例,MDRL-DE方法则在求解大规模和超大规模算例时相比其他算法优势明显。MDRL在非劣解集的收敛性和均匀性方面明显优于其他对比算法,为消防设施布局规划提供了一种有竞争力的解决方案。
