摘要
图形用户界面(GUI)外观设计侵权纠纷的实践案例反映出了其在保护范围、侵权判定标准及侵权行为认定等方面的问题。外观设计的保护客体与载体需有明确区分,确认GUI外观设计的保护客体为设计方案并未否认其与产品载体的依附关系,而是弱化了产品载体在GUI外观设计专利保护中的影响。“无形产品”在现行法律的文本解释层面还是在现实运行层面均无归属,作为外观设计专利载体的“产品”,目前仍只能限于有实体的“有形产品”,GUI外观设计专利的保护范围受到实体产品的限制。在具体侵权认定中,“一般消费者”的认知水平应高于普通公众,区别特征应考虑相对性的视角在“整体”标准下综合判断。在软硬分离的背景下,间接侵权理论在GUI外观设计专利侵权行为定性问题中具有特殊价值。
Practical cases involving infringement disputes over graphical user interface (GUI) appearance designs have revealed issues concerning the scope of protection, infringement determination standards, and the identification of infringing acts. The protectable subject matter of a GUI design patent is the design solution itself rather than the product, which does not imply that GUI designs can exist independently of products but rather weakens the influence of the product carrier in the protection of GUI design patents. Under the current legal framework, neither textual interpretation nor practical enforcement recognizes “intangible products” as valid carriers. Thus, the “product” serving as the carrier of a design patent must still be limited to tangible, physical products, thereby restricting the scope of protection for GUI design patents to their associated physical embodiments. In determining infringement, the cognitive level of the “average consumer” should be higher than that of the general public, and distinguishing features should be assessed from a relative perspective under the “overall appearance” standard. Against the backdrop of the separation between software and hardware, the theory of indirect infringement holds particular significance in qualifying acts of infringement involving GUI design patents.
出处
《社会科学前沿》
2025年第7期64-70,共7页
Advances in Social Sciences
