期刊文献+

循经捣刺督脉和少阳经穴治疗慢性紧张型头痛的临床观察

Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Chronic Tension-Type Headache by Acupuncture Du Channel and Shaoyang Channel Points
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察循经捣刺督脉和少阳经穴治疗慢性紧张型头痛临床疗效。方法:60例CTTH患者采用随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例。治疗组采用循经捣刺法,对照组采用常规针刺法,均每日治疗1次,每周治疗6次,连续治疗4周,采用VAS评分、头痛指数及焦虑自测量表比较两组疗效。结果:两组患者治疗后VAS评分、头痛指数及SAS评分均显著下降,与对照组比较差异显著(P Objective: To observe the clinical effect of acupuncture Du vein and Shaoyang meridian on chronic tension-type headache. Methods: 60 CTTH patients were divided into treatment group and control group by random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated with meridian ramming method, while the control group was treated with conventional acupuncture method, once a day, 6 times a week for 4 consecutive weeks. VAS score, headache index and self-measuring anxiety scale were used to compare the efficacy of the two groups. Results: VAS score, headache index and SAS score of 2 groups were significantly decreased after treatment, and the difference was significant compared with the control group (P < 0.05), the cure rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The curative effect of acupuncture is better than that of conventional acupuncture, which can relieve headache symptoms and anxiety in patients with chronic tension-type headache.
出处 《临床医学进展》 2024年第10期674-679,共6页 Advances in Clinical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献80

  • 1梁婷婷,尹平,徐世芬.针灸治疗抑郁症躯体化症状的临床研究概况[J].辽宁中医杂志,2020,47(1):203-206. 被引量:8
  • 2冯智英,邹静,华驾略,李颖,季伟华,沈沸,李焰生.国际头痛疾患分类第3版(试用版)-原发性头痛部分解读[J].神经病学与神经康复学杂志,2013,10(2):121-140. 被引量:91
  • 3黄玉莹,李郭飞,冯兴刚,沈群.阿米替林加丙戊酸钠对慢性紧张型头痛头痛指数的影响[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2005,11(2):123-123. 被引量:1
  • 4于生元,王蓉飞,杨飞,窦林森,曲辉,赵立杰,贺茂林,戚晓昆,李立波,方燕南,詹培源,潘小平,曾国玲,徐恩,邢诒刚.盐酸乙哌立松治疗伴有颈椎异常的紧张型头痛的疗效及安全性[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2005,11(6):327-329. 被引量:11
  • 5Woodforde JM,Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain[J].{H}Journal of Psychosomatic Research,1972,(03):173-178.
  • 6Jensen MP,Chen C,Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores:a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain[J].{H}Journal of Pain,2003,(07):407-414.
  • 7Gallagher E J,Liebman M,Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):633-638.
  • 8Gallagher E J,Bijur PE,Latimer C. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2002,(04):287-290.
  • 9Fosnocht DE,Chapman CR,Swanson ER. Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2005,(01):55-59.
  • 10Grilo RM,Treves R,Preux PM. Clinically relevant VAS pain score change in patients with acute rheumatic conditions[J].{H}Joint Bone Spine:Revue du Rhumatisme,2007,(04):358-361.

共引文献1090

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部