摘要
目的 评价全世界针刺减肥的随机对照试验的方法学质量和报告质量。方法 没有语言限制地系统、全 面 检 索 全 世 界 针 刺 减 肥 的 随 机 对 照 试 验 文 献 , 利 用 循 证 医 学 的 质 量 标 准 对 试 验 的 方 法 学 进 行 评 估 ; 并 参 照CONSORT 和 STRICT 清单对试验报告的质量进行评估。结果 共获得 7篇随机对照试验。1篇方法学质量等级为 A ,2篇方法学质量等级为 B ,4篇方法学质量等级为 C 。所有随机对照试验的报告质量等级均为 C 。结论 目前全世界针刺减肥的随机对照试验质量不高,尚不能为临床实践提供强有力的证据。针刺减肥的随机对照试验报告写作质量差,不能充分反映试验所有有用的信息。
Objective To evaluate the quality of methodology and reporting of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for obesity worldwide. Methods Collecting all the randomized controlled trials of acupu-ncture for obesity worldwide by systematically searching without language limitation. The quality of methodology and reporting was evaluated by the quality criteria recommended by Cochrane handbook and CONSORT(consolidate standards of reporting trial)and STRICTA(standard for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture)checklists. Results Seven randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for obesity were identified. The quality of methodology was graded as'A'in one trial,'B'in two trials and'C'in the other four trials. The reporting quality of the seven trials was graded as'C'. Conclusions The methodology quality of the randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for obesity was too poor to provide strong evidence for clinical practice, and the poor reporting quality of the trials resulted in inadequate information from the trials.
出处
《中国医学科学院学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2004年第2期192-194,共3页
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
关键词
针刺
肥胖
随机对照试验
方法学
写作
质量
acupuncture
obesity
randomized controlled trials
methodology
reporting
quality
