摘要
对两项关于样例学习心理实验研究的报告进行了逻辑分析 ,指出了Ross的研究设计的合理性以及莫雷等的“表面概貌对原理运用的影响的实验研究”中的逻辑欠缺 ,进而给出了莫雷等的结论“样例与作业问题表面概貌的相似性 ,不仅会影响原理的通达 ,而且也会影响原理的运用”尚不足信的断言 ,所以只能继续维持Ross的“表面概貌是否相似不影响原理的运用”的结论。最后明确了莫雷等实验研究应该采取的正确设计思路和方法。
Two experiment reports concerning worked example studying was logically analyzed and pointed out that the Ross's experiment design is rational and Mo Lei's experiment design is not rational. It was also pointed out that the conclusion 'the different superficial likeness of the example and problem in surface story lines would not only affect the principle's access, but also could affect the principle's use' is not still believable. We ought to restore Ross's results'similar story line only have little or no effects on the use'. Finally the exact way of the experiment design was pointed out.
出处
《心理学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2004年第2期240-246,共7页
Acta Psychologica Sinica
关键词
样例
表面概貌
对象对应
运用
通达
earlier example,story lines,object correspondence,use,access.
