期刊文献+

将科学方法教育引入科技馆展教活动的思考与实践 被引量:7

Thinking and Practice of Introducing Scientific Method Education into the Education Activities in Science and Technology Museum
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 由关注具体科学知识转向关注核心科学概念,是科技馆展教活动必须实现的转变。科学方法教育就是核心概念的重要内容之一。目前,科技馆教育活动以及馆校结合的课程中,知识领域的课程及活动占绝大多数,科学探究、科学方法方面的内容较少,受众们在掌握具体知识的同时,对科学家如何应用科学思维一步步探究、受挫、转换方法、获得成功的过程了解不够透彻。本文从科学方法的定义、普及科学方法的必要性出发,通过具体实例论证在科技馆展教活动中加入科学方法教育的必要性及实施策略,并就要注意的问题和今后努力的方向提出自己的见解。 The shift from paying attention to specific scientific knowledge to focusing on the core concepts of science is a change that must be realized in the education activities in science and technology museum. Scientific method education is one of the important contents of the core concepts. At present,the education activities in science and technology museum and the curriculums combined with museums and schools account for the vast majority in the knowledge field. There are less content in scientific inquiry and scientific methods,and the audience do not understand it clearly in the way how scientists explore,fail,transfer method and succeed step by step when they are mastering specific knowledge. This paper begins with the definition of scientific methods and the necessity of popularizing scientific methods,demonstrating the necessity and implementation strategy of scientific method education in the activities in science and technology museum through specific examples,and to put forward our own opinions on the problems to be paid attention to and the direction of future efforts.
作者 葛宇春 张凡华 Ge Yuchun;Zhang Fanhua
出处 《自然科学博物馆研究》 2018年第4期34-42,共9页 Journal of Natural Science Museum Research
关键词 科技馆 教育活动 核心概念 科学方法 策略 core concepts scientific method history of science education activities ideal model method
作者简介 葛宇春:合肥市科技馆展教中心副主任,群文馆馆员,研究方向:科技馆教育活动,通讯地址:合肥市黄山路446号市科技馆,邮编:230031,Email:7374980@qq.com;张凡华:合肥全象教育科技有限公司驻合肥市科技馆展教服务项目部科普辅导员,研究方向:科技馆教育活动,Email:565217549@qq.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1白月桥.课程标准实验稿课程目标订定的探讨[J].课程.教材.教法,2004,24(9):3-10. 被引量:35
  • 2管建祥.对物理教学模式构建的理性思考[J].通化师范学院学报,2007,28(4):87-89. 被引量:2
  • 3许茵,雷庆.中美K-12工程教育及其与高等工程教育衔接的比较研究[J].高等工程教育研究,2007,55(5):16-19. 被引量:9
  • 4Achieve, Inc. Development Overview of the Next Generation Science Education Standards [EB/OL]. http ://www. nextgenscience org/development-overview, 2012-09-10.
  • 5National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practice, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas[M].Washington, D.C.: the National Academies Press, 2011. 10, IX, 7,83,224-228,42,84,87,105-202.
  • 6Jerald C. O. Benchmarking for Success Ensuring U.S. Students Receive a World- Class Education[R]. Washington D.C.: National Governors Association, 2008. 13, 14.
  • 7Carnegie Corporation of New York. The Equation Opportunity[EB/OL]. http:// opportunityequation, org/uploads/files/oe_report, pdf,2012-09-15.
  • 8National Research Council. A Brief Report of the Framework of K-12 Science Education[EB/OL]. http://www7 nationalacademies, org/bose/Frameworks_Report_Brief. pdf, 2012-09-15.
  • 9Gross P. R. Review Research Council's of the National for K-12 Science Education[EB/OL].http://www. edexcellencemedia. net/publications/2011/20111004_NRC/20111004_NRC_FINAL. pdf, 2012-09-20.
  • 10Berland L. K. & McNeill K. L. A Learning Progression for Scientific Argumentation: Understanding Student Work and Designing Supportive Instructional Contexts[J]. Science Education, 2010,94(5): 781.

共引文献141

同被引文献45

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部