期刊文献+

防霾还是治霾:居民行为选择及意愿研究 被引量:3

Behavior Selection and Willingness of Residents to Deal with or Fight PM_(2.5)
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从提高居民环境参与意识出发,通过抽样调查方式运用结构方程模型分析居民对于PM_(2.5)的认知情况对其行为选择的影响。在此基础上,借助意愿评价法(CVM)、二元选择模型和排序选择模型,建立了居民为降低PM_(2.5)健康风险的支付愿意和支付金额的影响因素模型。研究表明,在居民做出的降低PM_(2.5)健康风险的行为选择中,保护性行为的受影响程度最高;同时,年龄、学历、健康状况、年收入等因素对支付意愿和支付金额有显著影响。 This paper used structural equation model to investigate the residents' awareness and the influence on behaviors selection of PM_(2.5)by sampling survey in order to improve the environmental awareness of residents' participation. On this basis,by using the contingent valuation method( CVM),binary choice model and ordered choice model,we established the model of factors that affect residents' willingness to pay of reducing PM_(2.5)health risk. The results demonstrated that the protection behaviors had been affected by the highest degree in residents' behavior selection to pay of reducing PM_(2.5)health risk. At the same time,the four factors of age,education,health and income had the significant influence on the willingness and the amount of payment.
作者 陈弄祺 许瀛
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第S1期90-93,共4页 China Population,Resources and Environment
关键词 PM2.5 结构方程模型 意愿评价法 二元选择模型 排序选择模型 PM2.5 structural equation model contingent valuation method binary choice model ordered choice model
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Anna Alberini,Alistair Hunt,Anil Markandya.??Willingness to Pay to Reduce Mortality Risks: Evidence from a Three-Country Contingent Valuation Study(J)Environmental & Resource Economics . 2006 (2)
  • 2Lynn Frewer.??The public and effective risk communication(J)Toxicology Letters . 2004 (1)
  • 3曾贤刚,谢芳,宗佺.降低PM2.5健康风险的行为选择及支付意愿——以北京市居民为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(1):127-133. 被引量:41
  • 4XIAOHUA YU,DAVID ABLER.??Incorporating zero and missing responses into CVM with open-ended bidding: willingness to pay for blue skies in Beijing(J)Environment and Development Economics . 2010 (5)

二级参考文献14

  • 1Slovic P. Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy[ J]. Risk Analysis, 1993,13(6) :675 -682.
  • 2Frewer O. The Public and Effective Risk Communication [ J ]. Toxicology Letters, 2004,149 ( 1 - 3 ) : 391 - 397.
  • 3Loewenstein G F, Weber E U, Hsee C K. Risk as Feelings [ J ]. Psychological Bulletin, 2001, 127 ( 2 ) : 267 - 286.
  • 4Hammitt J K. Valuing Mortality Risk: Theory and Practice [ J ]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2000,34:1396 -1400.
  • 5Viscusi W K, Aldy J E. The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Markets Estimates Throughout the World [ J ]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2003,27:5 - 76.
  • 6曾贤刚.环境影响经济评价[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003.
  • 7Freeman A M. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods [ J ]. Resources for the Future, Washington, 1993.
  • 8Carson R T, Hanemann W. Contingent Valuation-handbook of Environment Economics[ M]. Elsevier, 2005:824 - 826.
  • 9Tsuge T, KishimotoA, Takeuchi K. Achoice Experiment Approach tothe Valuation of Mortality [ J ]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2005,31:73 -95.
  • 10Alberini A, Alistair H, Markandya A. Willingness to Pay to Reduce Mortality Risks : Evidence from a Three-country Contingent Valuationstudy [ J]. Environmental a.d Resource Economics, 2006, 33:251 - 264.

共引文献41

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部