期刊文献+

死淘鸡堆肥和深埋处理过程微生物多样性分析及效果比较

Analysis of Microbial Diversity and Its Effect on Composting and Treatment of Dead Chicken
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 试验研究了堆肥和深埋法对死淘鸡的处理效果,以及不同处理方法对微生物多样性和有害菌变化的影响。结果显示:堆肥的日平均温度均高于深埋,腐熟阶段前期堆肥的OTU数目平均值均低于深埋组,夏季各试验组均导致分类门组成的显著变化,主要表现为厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)大量增加,相对丰度为90%以上,说明高温能有效抑制大量嗜温菌生长,并杀死堆体中的病原菌,满足无害化处理卫生学标准;腐熟阶段后期,各组的OTU数目、Tags数量和菌群丰度均逐渐提高,其中堆肥组中细菌菌群较为活跃;试验结束时,堆肥组与深埋组死淘鸡分解率相比较差异显著(P<0.05)。结果提示,堆肥组的死淘鸡分解情况明显优于深埋组。 The experiment was conducted to study the effects of composting and deep burying on dead-cleaning chickens, and the effects of different treatments on microbial diversity and changes of harmful bacteria. The results showed that the average daily temperature of compost was higher than that of deep-buried compost, and the average number of OTU in early stage of composting was lower than that of deep-buried compost. In summer, the composition of taxonomic phylum changed significantly in all experimental groups. The main manifestation was that the number of Firmicutes increased greatly, and the relative abundance was more than 90%. This indicated that high temperature could effectively suppress the growth of Firmicutes. At the end of the experiment, the decomposition rate of the compost group was lower than that of the deep-buried group. The difference was significant(P<0.05). It′s suggested that the decomposition of dead-washed chickens in composting group was significantly better than that in deep-buried group.
作者 夏波 蒋小松 杨朝武 杜华锐 张增荣 彭涵 邱莫寒 熊霞 余春林 宋小燕 胡陈明 杨礼 陈家磊 李晴云 XIA Bo;JIANG Xiaosong;YANG Chaowu;DU Huarui;ZHANG Zengrong;PENG Han;QIU Mohan;XIONG Xia;YU Chunlin;SONG Xiaoyan;HU Chenming;YANG Li;CHEN Jialei;LI Qingyun(Sichuan Animal Science Academy,Chengdu,Sichuan 610066;Sichuan Daheng Poultry Breeding Co],Ltd],Chengdu,Sichuan 610066;Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics of Sichuan Province,Chengdu,Sichuan 610066)
出处 《中国家禽》 北大核心 2019年第4期33-37,共5页 China Poultry
基金 四川省育种攻关(2016NYZ0043) 四川省基本科研业务专项(SASA2017A08) 现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-42) 四川省重大科技专项(2018NZDZX0004)
关键词 死淘鸡 无害化处理 堆肥 深埋 微生物多样性 dead chicken harmless treatment compost treatment microbial diversity
作者简介 夏波(1978-),男,副研究员,本科,主要从事家禽育种与生产研究,E-mail:12532976@qq.com;通讯作者:李晴云(1964-),男,研究员,本科,主要从事家禽育种与生产研究,E-mail:liqingyun2008@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1习佳林.通风对堆肥处理死鸡效果的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2010.
  • 2Flory G A,Peer R W.Verification of poultry carcass composting research through application during actual avian influenza outbreaks[J].Institute for Laboratory Animal Research,2010,51(2):149-157.
  • 3Wilkinson KG.The biosecurity of on-farm mortality composting[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,2007,102(3):609-618.
  • 4Bendfeldt E S,Peer R W,Flory G A.In-house composting as a rapid response to avian influenza[J].Bio Cycle,2006,47(5):38-42.
  • 5Tablante NL,Malone GW.Controlling avian influenza through inhouse composting of depopulated flocks:sharing Delmarva's experience[C].Proceedings of 2006 National Symposium on Carcass Disposal.2006.
  • 6Kalbasi A,Mukhtar S,Hawkins S E,et al.Carcass composting for management of farm mortalities:a review[J].Compost Science&Utilization,2005,13(3):180-193.
  • 7Xu W P,Reuter T,Xu Y P,et al.Field scale evaluation of bovine-specific DNA as an indicator of tissue degradation during cattle mortality composting[J].Bioresource Technology,2011,102(7):4800-4806.
  • 8Xu W P,Reuter T,Xu Y P,et al.Use of quantitative and conventional PCR to assess biodegradation of bovine and plant DNA during cattle mortality composting[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2009,43(16):6248-6255.
  • 9Murray D,Meidinger R G,Golovan S P,et al.Transgene and mitochondrial DNA are indicators of efficient composting of transgenic pig carcasses[J].Bioresource Technology,2007,98(9):1795-1804.
  • 10Akdeniz N,Koziel J A,Ahn H K,et al.Laboratory scale evaluation of volatile organic compound emissions as indication of swine carcass degradation inside biosecure composting units[J].Bioresource Technology,2010,101(1):71-78.

共引文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部