摘要
柏拉图的'未成文学说'的真实性一直备受争议。而其《巴门尼德篇》则因其晦涩难解而闻名。本文认为,柏拉图的《巴门尼德篇》之所以难解,与'未成文学说'隐没不彰有关。柏拉图晚年的哲学建构是形上学与存有论。但柏拉图未曾揭示其形上学的核心:εv(太一),与辩证法的阶梯:àóριστοζδυαζ(不定的二),就直接在《巴门尼德篇》中阐述关于'一与多'的辩证法的练习,使读者难以理解其真实目的。而其实《巴门尼德篇》的辩证法练习的探讨所展示的,就是'未成文学说'。
The authenticity of Plato’s unwritten doctrines remains to be controversial;and the abstrusity of Plato’s Parmenides wins for it its fame.This article shows that the abstrusity of Parmenides is related to inadequate attention to and recognition of Plato’s unwritten doctrines.What late Plato constructs is metaphysics and ontology.Without explaining the core of his metaphysics:εν(the one) and the ladder of dialectics:αοριστοζ δναζ(indeterminate dyad),Plato goes straight to illustrating the practice of dialectics about " one and many" in Parmenides.This causes the difficulty in understanding the true intention of Parmenides.Actually,what the practice of dialectics in Parmenides reveals is exactly his unwritten doctrines.
出处
《清华西方哲学研究》
2015年第1期157-185,共29页
Tsinghua Studies in Western Philosophy
基金
辅仁大学研发处研究计划:《柏拉图的未成文学说(专案编号:9991A01/计划编号:A0103006)之初步成果
辅仁大学研发处资助
