摘要
敌友关系是探究政治本性时必然会遇到的基本理论问题。施密特、德里达和墨菲从不同角度对这个问题进行了探讨。施密特认为政治的最终标准就是划分敌友关系;德里达强调政治应该化敌为友,将政治理解为友爱的政治学;墨菲则主张应该将敌人转化为对手,将对抗转化为抗争。墨菲的抗争政治学介于施密特的决断政治学和德里达的友爱政治学之间,是在坚持对抗的基础上力图将伦理学引入政治学之中的尝试,为我们理解文化多元主义背景下的敌友关系提供了某种新的思路。
The relationship between foe and friend is the fundamental question of exploring the nature of politics.Karl Schmitt,Derrida and Mouffe make different research on this question from different views.Schmitt insists that the standard of politics is to differentiate foe and friend,Derrida proposes that the politics should transfer foe to friend,that is to say,the politics mainly concerns the foe.Mouffe thinks that the foe should transfer to adversary,the antagonism should transfer to agonism.Mouffe’s agonism politics locates between Schmitt’s resolution politics and Derrida’s friendly politics.She tries to recall the antagonism of the politics and bring the dimension of ethics to politics.Mouffe’s research can give us a new way to understand the relationship between foe and friend in the context of cultural pluralism.
出处
《南京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第4期44-48,55,共6页
Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
基金
国家社科基金项目"当代西方激进左翼的元政治学研究"(17CZX009)的阶段性成果
关键词
朋友
敌人
对手
政治
friend
foe
adversary
politics
作者简介
莫雷,南开大学哲学院副教授天津300191
