3Ashley, K. , & Goldin, I. (2011 ). Toward an enhanced com- puter-supported peer review in legal education [ C ]. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Sys- tems:77-88.
4Goldin, I. (2012). Accounting for peer reviewer bias with Bayesian models[A]. Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Support for Learning Groups of the 11 th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems[ C]. 122-140.
5Goldin, 1., & Ashley, K. (2011). Peering inside peer review with Bayesian models[ C]. Proceedings of the 15th International Confer- ence on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED'I 1:90-97.
6Russell, A. A. (2004). Calibrated peer review: A writing and critical-thinking instructional tool [ J ]. Teaching Tips: Innovations in Undergraduate Science Instruction: 54-70.
7Sadler, P. M. , & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peer -grading on student learning[J]. Educational Assessment, 11 (1) : 1-31.
8Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing,4(3 ) : 35-52.
9任友群.教师培训如何与MOOCs牵手[N].中国教育报,2013-11-4:(5).
10Bates, T. .(2012). What's Right and What's Wrong about Coursera-Style MOOCs? [ DB/OL]. [ 2012-09-20 ]. http://www, to- nybates, ca/2012/08/05/whats -right -and -whats-wrong-about -coursera -style-moocs/.
