期刊文献+

Numerical study on flow control of ship airwake and rotor airload during helicopter shipboard landing 被引量:9

Numerical study on flow control of ship airwake and rotor airload during helicopter shipboard landing
原文传递
导出
摘要 A numerical study on flow control of ship airwake during shipboard landing is carried out to address the effect of flow control devices on helicopter rotor airload. The in-house Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS) based solver Rotorcraft AeroDynamics and Aeroacoustics Solver(RADAS), with combination of momentum source approach is employed to conduct the helicopter shipboard landing simulation. The control effects of three aerodynamic modifications of ship superstructure, i.e. ramp, notch and flap, in different Wind-Over-Deck(WOD) conditions are discussed.From the steady simulation results, the effect of spatial variation of ship airwake on rotor airloads is concluded. The aerodynamic modifications reduce the strength of shedding vortex and increase rotor normal force through delaying and relieving flow separation, and therefore are beneficial to alleviate the limitation of control inputs. By contrast, the perturbation of unsteady ship airwake can cause the serious oscillation of rotor forces during shipboard landing. The unsteady simulations show that the turbulence intensity of ship airwake and oscillatory rotor airloading, represented by Root-Mean-Square(RMS) loading, can be remarkably reduced by the ramp and notch modifications, while the flap modification has adverse effect. It means that flow control devices have large potential benefits to alleviate the pilot's workload and improve the shipboard landing safety, but they should be well designed to avoid the introduction of more vortex, which leads to increase in disturbance of flow field. A numerical study on flow control of ship airwake during shipboard landing is carried out to address the effect of flow control devices on helicopter rotor airload. The in-house Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS) based solver Rotorcraft AeroDynamics and Aeroacoustics Solver(RADAS), with combination of momentum source approach is employed to conduct the helicopter shipboard landing simulation. The control effects of three aerodynamic modifications of ship superstructure, i.e. ramp, notch and flap, in different Wind-Over-Deck(WOD) conditions are discussed.From the steady simulation results, the effect of spatial variation of ship airwake on rotor airloads is concluded. The aerodynamic modifications reduce the strength of shedding vortex and increase rotor normal force through delaying and relieving flow separation, and therefore are beneficial to alleviate the limitation of control inputs. By contrast, the perturbation of unsteady ship airwake can cause the serious oscillation of rotor forces during shipboard landing. The unsteady simulations show that the turbulence intensity of ship airwake and oscillatory rotor airloading, represented by Root-Mean-Square(RMS) loading, can be remarkably reduced by the ramp and notch modifications, while the flap modification has adverse effect. It means that flow control devices have large potential benefits to alleviate the pilot's workload and improve the shipboard landing safety, but they should be well designed to avoid the introduction of more vortex, which leads to increase in disturbance of flow field.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2019年第2期324-336,共13页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. NS2018007)
关键词 Flow control HELICOPTER ROTOR airload SHIP airwake SHIPBOARD LANDING Flow control Helicopter Rotor airload Ship airwake Shipboard landing
作者简介 Corresponding author:Yongjie SHI,E-mail address:shiyongjie@nuaa.edu.cn。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献46

  • 1Brentner KS, Farassat F.Helicopter noise prediction: the current status and future direction.J Sound Vib 1994;170(1):79-96.
  • 2Brentner KS, Lyrintzis AS, Koutsavdis EK.Comparison of computational aero acoustic prediction methods for transonic rotor noise.J Aircr 1997;34(4):531-8.
  • 3Morgans AS, Karabasov SA, Dowling AP, et al.Transonic helicopter noise.AIAA J 2005;43(7):1512-24.
  • 4Marze H, Gervais M, Martin P, et al.Acoustic flight test of the EC130 B4 in the scope of the FRIENDCOPTER project.In: 64th annual forum proceedings american helicopter society, vol.3.2008.p.2557-71.
  • 5Brentner KS, Farassat F.Modeling aerodynamically generated sound of helicopter rotors.Prog Aerosp Sci 2003;39(2-3):83-120.
  • 6Leishman JG.Principles of helicopter aerodynamics.Cam?bridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.p.502-4.
  • 7Yu YH.Rotor blade-vortex interaction noise.Prog Aerosp Sci 2000;36(2):97-115.
  • 8Boxwell DA, Yu YH, Schmitz FH.Hovering impulsive noise?some measured and calculated results.Vertica 1979;3(1):35-45.
  • 9Prieur J, Rahier G.Comparison of Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings and Kirchhoff rotor noise calculations.AIAA-98-2376; 1998.
  • 10Lighthill MJ.On sound generated aerodynamically.I.General theory.Proc R Soc Lond A 1952;211(1107):564-87.

共引文献36

同被引文献51

引证文献9

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部