摘要
万历三十九年(1611)的辛亥京察出现了若干意外,是引发万历后期党争的重要事件."东林党操控辛亥京察"这一结论在天启年间随着阉党势力崛起产生,并在后世成为定谳.在辛亥京察期间,亲历者根据事态发展不断调整言说内容及其表达方式,以求实现政治意图,塑造个人形象;在辛亥京察之后,史家们通过选定立场、删改情节、制造对立等方式书写历史,使其对辛亥京察的叙事符合当下政治的需要,最终将其构筑为晚明东林神话的一个注脚.记述辛亥京察的三类文本呈现出古代政治事件的固有解读模式,后世对政治事件的解析总是经历由复杂到简洁,最终简化为忠奸对立叙事的过程.
There were several accidents in the Xinhai capital official inspection in the 39th year of Wanli Dynasty(1611),which was an important event that triggered party-struggles in the late Wanli period.The conclusion of"Donglin Party manipulated the Xinhai inspection"came into being with the rise of the eunuch faction during the Tianqi Dynasty,and became a verdict in the later ages.During the period of Xinhai inspection,the witnesses constantly adjusted the content and expression of their speech according to the development of the situation,in order to achieve political intentions and shape their personal image;After the Xinhai inspection,historians wrote history by selecting positions,deleting plots and creating antagonism,so that their narratives to the Xinhai capital official inspection met the needs of current politics,and finally built the inspection as a footnote to the myth of Donglin in the late Ming Dynasty.The three kinds of texts of the inspection show the inherent interpretation mode of ancient political events,later generations'analysis of political events always goes through the process from complex to conciseness,and finally simplified to the dual-antagonistic narrative model of loyalty and treacherousness.
出处
《励耘学刊》
2025年第1期119-137,M0006,共20页
关键词
万历辛亥京察
东林党
历史解读
the Capital Official Inspection in the Xinhai Year of the Wanli Reign
Donglin Party
History Interpretation
作者简介
李沛雨,北京师范大学文学院博士研究生,研究方向为元明清文学。
