摘要
中国式现代化治理目标下,城市更新应承担起高质量发展、实现城市治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要使命。城市更新后评估是城市更新全生命管理周期的重要环节,自2021年衔接城市体检工作以后,其重要性更加突出。在总结我国城市更新后评估研究的时空特征基础上,本文构建了“类型—尺度”整体分析框架,对当前国内城市更新后评估既有研究进行系统梳理。研究发现,我国城市更新后评估经历了从经济效益到综合效益的价值转变,研究整体呈现滞后性、零碎性特征;不同类型城市更新后评估在相同尺度下的关注重点存在共性,更新类型与空间尺度是影响后评估指标体系差异的主要因素。总体而言,当前城市更新后评估指标构建缺乏对城市现代化治理的深刻理解,评估方法有待改进。最后对现代化治理背景下城市更新后评估研究进行了角色反思与未来展望,以期进一步丰富我国城市更新理论与方法。
Under the goals of Chinese path to modernization governance,urban regeneration should undertake the important mission of high-quality development,realizing the modernization of system and capacity for urban governance.The post-assessment is an important part of the lifecycle management of urban regeneration,and its importance has become more prominent since it was connected with urban physical examination in 2021.This paper uses statistical,bibliometric,and data visualization methods to analyze the current research on post-urban regeneration assessment in China.On the basis of summarizing the spatiotemporal characteristics of post-urban regeneration assessment research in China,this paper constructs an overall analysis framework of“type-scale”and organizes the existing research on post-urban regeneration assessment in China.The main research findings are as follows:In terms of spatiotemporal characteristics:1)The post-urban regeneration assessment in China has undergone a value transformation from economic benefits to comprehensive benefits.2)Regions with high urbanization rates,such as Guangdong,Beijing,Shanghai,and Chongqing,exhibit a higher concentration of published studies on post-urban regeneration assessment.Furthermore,research in this domain within these regions demonstrates a rapid pace of development.3)The existing research on post-urban regeneration assessment are lagging and fragmented,significantly influenced by relevant national and local policies and systems,urban regeneration practices,and actions.Research on the evaluation index system of existing urban regeneration have found that:1)The focus of post-urban regeneration assessment for different types of urban regeneration shares commonalities at the same scale.The macro-scale mainly focuses on its overall connection and interaction with the city,exploring the impact of various types of regeneration on the cultural,economic,social,and environmental functions of the city.At the mid-scale,various types of update objects are often viewed as a whole,and their post-assessment emphasizes more on the changes and effects of the whole itself,with an emphasis on exploring community cohesion.At the micro-scale,post-assessment is often conducted from aspects such as material space facilities and user satisfaction.2)The type of regeneration and spatial scale are the main factors affecting the differences in postassessment indicator systems.Overall,the selection of indicators is mostly derived from domestic post-urban regeneration assessment is an important means of supervising high-quality urban construction and achieving high-quality urban environment,an important link in the entire life cycle of urban regeneration,also an effective way to respond to people’s urgent needs.We propose exploring a refined posturban regeneration assessment methodology from a holistic“type-scale”angle through three key dimensions:1)Based on different types of urban regeneration objects and dimensions of post-assessment scale,deepen the cognition of diversity of post-urban regeneration assessment.By establishing target governance for urban regeneration interventions and multi-scalar frameworks for post-assessment,it is possible to refine the post-assessment agents,targets,and operational objectives of urban regeneration post-assessment.This enables the construction of a methodological framework tailored to address the inherent heterogeneity,diversity,dynamic growth imperatives,and sustainability requirements of urban regeneration.Such a framework provides theoretical principles and scientific foundations for comprehensively appraising the holistic value of urban regeneration and guiding evidence-based regeneration practices.2)Integrate multidisciplinary knowledge systems and technical methodologies to refine urban regeneration post-assessment indicators and methods.By incorporating emerging approaches such as big data analytics and novel technologies,a future-oriented post-assessment theoretical framework can be developed.3)By standardizing and institutionalizing of post-urban regeneration assessment mechanism,constructing the urban regeneration management and post-assessment process,and formulating the reference rules for the post-urban regeneration assessment,we can improve the life cycle management of urban regeneration and ensure the implementation of the post-urban regeneration assessment.
作者
黄瓴
刘祖康
骆骏杭
HUANG Ling;LIU Zukang;LUO Junhang
出处
《西部人居环境学刊》
北大核心
2025年第2期97-104,共8页
Journal of Human Settlements in West China
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目(51778078)
重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(cstc2021jcjy-msxmX1055)。
关键词
城市更新
后评估
现代化治理
类型—尺度
整体视角
urban regeneration
post-assessment
modern governance
type-scale
holistic angle of view
作者简介
通讯作者:黄瓴,重庆大学建筑城规学院,山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,教授,hwawa1025@vip.163.com;刘祖康,重庆大学建筑城规学院,硕士研究生;骆骏杭,重庆大学建筑城规学院,博士研究生。
