摘要
在朱子学遭受阳明学冲击的背景下,高攀龙力主尊朱辟王,维护程朱为孔孟道统之传;继承李材、崔铣等说,持《大学》“古本”错简论,肯定《大学》的核心地位;以“知本”“格物”作为《大学》中心范畴,强调心理与物理的同一,以回应阳明对朱子的批评;反对阳明无善无恶之说,捍卫儒家性善论,突出复性的重要意义。高攀龙的《大学》诠释,以宗朱护朱为底色,同时吸收转化了阳明、李材的思想,体现了晚明朱子学综合创新的发展新趋向。
In the context of the impact of Yangming School on Zhuzi School,Gao Panlong advocated respecting Zhu and criticizing Wang,and upheld Cheng and Zhu as the orthodoxy successors of the Confucian—Mencius;he inherited their views of Li Cai and Cui Xian,believed in the“ancient version”of The Great Learning,and affirmed the core position of The Great Learning;he took“knowing the root”and“investigating things”as the central categories of The Great Learning,emphasized the unity of the principles of things and mind to respond Yangming’s criticism of Zhuzi;he opposed Yangming’s opinion that human nature is no good or evil,defended the goodness of human nature in Confucian theory,and highlighted the importance of restoring human nature.Gao Panlong’s interpretation of The Great Learning is based on the principle of respecting and protecting Zhuzi,while absorbing and transforming the ideas of Yangming and Li Cai,reflecting the new development trend of comprehensive innovation of Zhuzi school in the late Ming Dynasty.
出处
《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
北大核心
2025年第2期76-86,共11页
Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(21VGQ018)。
关键词
高攀龙
《大学》学
朱子学
阳明学
Gao Panlong
The Great Learning Studies
Zhuzi School
Yangming School
作者简介
许家星,福建省社会科学研究基地武夷学院朱子学研究中心研究员,北京师范大学价值与文化研究中心、哲学学院教授,博士研究生导师。
