摘要
新公共管理对全球教育领域产生了深远影响,问责主义成为全球主要国家中小学教师绩效评价体系的设计与实施逻辑,教师绩效评价作为一种表现报告、技术过程与制度化进程,对教师、学生以及学校系统发挥质量管理功能。根据不同国家的教师绩效评价主体、内容与方式,教师绩效评价模式可分为官僚问责、专业问责、市场问责与管理问责四种模式,管理问责逐步成为全球教师绩效评价的主流模式。当前,教师绩效评价的效用仍存在限度,联合国教科文组织《全球教师报告》倡议面向未来,教师绩效评价应发挥多主体作用,服务教师发展性,并合理审慎运用绩效评价结果。为此,不少国家通过完善指标体系、提升评价主体专业化水平以及改进评价技术,促使教师绩效评价逐步向善。
The New Public Management has exerted a profound impact on the global education field,positioning accountability as the guiding principle for designing and implementing primary and secondary school teachers' performance evaluation systems in major countries worldwide.Teacher performance evaluation functions as a quality management tool for teachers,students and the school system,encompassing performance reporting,technical processes and institutionalization.According to the subject,content and method of teacher performance evaluation in different countries,the teacher performance evaluation model can be divided into four modes:bureaucratic accountability,professional accountability,market accountability and managerial accountability,with managerial accountability gradually becoming the dominant mode of global teacher performance evaluation.Currently,there are still limits to the effectiveness of teacher performance evaluation.UNESCO's Global Report on Teachers advocates that,for the future,teacher performance evaluation should play a multi-subject role,serve the developmental nature of teachers,and use the results of performance evaluation in a reasonable and prudent manner.In response,many countries have promoted the teacher performance evaluation for good by refining the indicator system,upgrading the professionalism of evaluation subjects and improving evaluation techniques.
作者
宋佳
王芮
朱莹
SONG Jia;WANG Rui;ZHU Ying
出处
《中国教育学刊》
2025年第1期29-36,共8页
Journal of The Chinese Society of Education
基金
2024年度全国教育科学规划国家青年课题“世界主要国家高等教育制度型开放战略研究”(项目编号:CDA240262)研究成果。
关键词
教师绩效评价
管理问责
教师评价改革
全球教师报告
teacher performance evaluation
managerial accountability
teacher evaluation reform
Global Report on Teachers
作者简介
宋佳,上海师范大学国际与比较教育研究院,联合国教科文组织教师教育中心副教授,教育部“教育大数据与教育决策实验室”研究人员(上海200234);王芮,华南师范大学国际与比较教育研究所博士研究生(广东广州510631);通讯作者:朱莹,上海师范大学教育学院党委副书记、副院长(上海200234)。