期刊文献+

X线正位片中椎弓根间距对预判胸腰椎爆裂骨折严重程度的价值 被引量:6

Value of interpedicular distance on anteroposterior plain radiographs to predict severity of thoracolumbar burst fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨X线正位片中椎弓根间距(IPD)在预判胸腰椎爆裂骨折严重程度的价值。方法回顾性分析自2010-03—2012-12已确诊为胸腰椎爆裂骨折(单一椎体)的43例,测量胸腰椎X线正位片中骨折椎体及其上下2个椎体的IPD,根据多平面重建CT及MRI进行负荷分担评分及TLICS评分,同时进行ASIA分类,分析IPD与负荷分担评分、TLICS评分及ASIA分类之间的关系。结果 IPD增宽38例(88.4%),可疑增宽2例(4.7%),没有增宽3例(7.0%)。IPD与ASIA分类(r=0.33,P=0.035<0.05)、TLICS评分具有显著相关性(r=-0.37,P=0.017<0.05)。IPD与负荷分担评分之间没有相关性(r=-0.116,P=0.469>0.05)。结论对于急性创伤所致的胸腰椎爆裂骨折,X线片中IPD有助于预判胸腰椎爆裂骨折严重程度,可为临床医师制定下一步检查及治疗方案提供指导。 Objective To investigate the value of interpedicular distance on anteroposterior plain radiographs to predict the severity of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods Forty three patients diagnosed with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated in our spinal surgery department from Mar. 2010 to Dec. 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. All of patients had single-level vertebral burst fracture, and the IDP(interpedicular distance) on X-ray of fractured vertebra was measured, compared with above and below IDP of fractured vertebra. The load sharing score, the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score(TLICS) and ASIA neurological classification of spinal cord injury were recorded according to the findings of CT, MRI and the symptom and physical sign of patients. The relationship between IDP and these three scoring system was analyzed. Results On plain radiographs of the spine in the AP, the IDP was widened in 38 patient(88.4%) and there was no change in 3 patients(6.9%). The IDP of 2 patients(4.7%) was suspected with broadening. The IDP was significantly correlated with ASIA neurological classification of spinal cord injury(r =0.33,P =0.035 <0.05), as well as TLICS(r =-0.37,P =0.017 <0.05.However, there was no relationship between IDP and the load sharing score(r =-0.116,P =0.469>0.05). Conclusion IPD measured from plain radiographs is useful to assess the severity of thoracolumbar burst fractures in acute spinal injury patients, which provides important information to help physician make further decision.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2014年第5期430-432,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词 X线片 CT MRI 椎弓根间距 脊柱爆裂骨折 胸腰椎 X-ray plain CT MRI Interpedicular distance Spinal burst fracture Thoracolumbar vertebra
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1赵浩增,王向阳,林胜磊,夏冬冬,季伟,徐华梓,池永龙.胸腰椎爆裂骨折后伤椎矢状面压缩面积和骨碎块面积的测量及其意义[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(5):409-411. 被引量:3
  • 2廖中亚,胡伟,吴建明,刘杰,马成才.前后路手术治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的临床疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,27(10):958-959. 被引量:3
  • 3关骅,陈学明.脊髓损伤ASIA神经功能分类标准(2000年修订)[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2001,11(3):164-164. 被引量:151
  • 4唐三元,徐永年,郑玉明,陈庄洪.测量椎弓根间距诊断胸腰椎椎管后环骨折[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1997,7(1):20-22. 被引量:1
  • 5Peter Lewkonia,Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci,Ken Thomas.Reliability of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score and Comparison With the Denis Classification for Injury to the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine[J].Spine.2012(26)
  • 6Maria Fernanda Silber Caffaro,Osmar Avanzi.Can the Interpedicular Distance Reliably Assess the Severity of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures?[J].Spine.2012(4)
  • 7Alexander R. Vaccaro,Ronald A. Lehman,R John Hurlbert,Paul A. Anderson,Mitchel Harris,Rune Hedlund,James Harrop,Marcel Dvorak,Kirkham Wood,Michael G. Fehlings,Charles Fisher,Steven C. Zeiller,D Greg Anderson,Christopher M. Bono,Gordon H. Stock,Andrew K. Brown,Timothy Kuklo,F C. ?ner.A New Classification of Thoracolumbar Injuries: The Importance of Injury Morphology, the Integrity of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex, and Neurologic Status[J].Spine.2005(20)
  • 8Thomas McCormack,Eldin Karaikovic,Robert W. Gaines.The Load Sharing Classification of Spine Fractures[J].Spine.1994(15)

二级参考文献15

  • 1解京明,王大兴,张颖,王迎松.前路减压内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折(附82例报告)[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(4):247-249. 被引量:38
  • 2Denis F. Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine con- cept in acute spinal trauma[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984,189:65.
  • 3Parker JW,Lane JR,Karalkovic EE,et 81. Successful shortsegment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures:a con- secutive 41/22 year series [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976),2000,25 (9): 1157-1170.
  • 4McCormack T,Karaikovic E,Gaines RW. Hie load sharing ciassiii*cation of spine fractures[J]. Spine, 1994,19: 1741-1744.
  • 5Wang XY,Dai LY,Xu HZfet al Biomechanical effect of the extentof vertebral body fracture on the thoracolumbar spine after pediclescrew fixation: an in vitro study [J]. J Clin Neurosci,2008,15: 286-290.
  • 6Ohlin A, Karrlson M, Duppe Htet al. Complications after transpedic-ular stabilization of the spine. A survivorship analysis of 163 cases[J]. Spine,1994,19: 2774-2779.
  • 7Metha JS,Reed MR,Mcvie JL,et al. Weight-bearing radiographs inthoracolumbar fractures: do they influence management [J]? Spine,2004,29:564-567.
  • 8Aligizakis AC,Katonis PG,Sapkas G,et al. Gertzbein and loadingsharing classifications for unstable thoracolumbar fractures [J]. ClinOrthop,2003,411: 77-85.
  • 9Dai LY,Jin WJ. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the loadsharing classiHcation in the assessment of thoracolumbar burst frac-tures[J]. Spine,2005,30: 354-358.
  • 10Chen HH,Wang WK,Li KC,et al. Biomechanical effects of the bodyaugmenter for reconstruction of the vertebral body [J]. Spine,2004,29: 382-387.

共引文献155

同被引文献44

引证文献6

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部