期刊文献+

经直肠超声和MRI检查对中低位直肠癌术前环周切缘的诊断价值

The value of transrectal ultrasonography and MRI in preoperative diagnosis of peripherally incised margin of middle and low rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经直肠超声(ERUS)和磁共振成像(MRI)检查对中低位直肠癌术前环周切缘(CRM)的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2023年1月内蒙古自治区人民医院收治的89例直肠癌患者的临床资料。分析中低位直肠癌的临床病理因素与CRM是否受累的关系;以术后病理为金标准,分析ERUS和MRI术前评估中低位直肠癌CRM的准确率及诊断效能。结果89例患者术后病理结果均为直肠癌,其中77例病理结果为CRM阴性,12例CRM阳性,阳性率为13.48%(12/89)。病理TN分期、直肠癌壁外血管侵犯(EMVI)与中低位直肠癌CRM是否受累有关,具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。与病理结果对比,ERUS术前评估直肠癌CRM受累情况的准确率为88.76%(Kappa=0.578,P<0.001),灵敏度75.00%,特异度90.91%,阴性预测值95.89%,阳性预测值56.25%AUC为0.788;MRI术前评估CRM受累情况的准确率为88.76%(Kappa=0.602,P<0.001),灵敏度83.33%,特异度89.61%,阴性预测值97.18%,阳性预测值55.56%,AUC为0.830,二者AUC比较差异无统计学意义(Z=0.420,P=0.674)。结论ERUS和MRI检查术前评估中低位直肠癌CRM状态具有较高准确率,ERUS可作为MRI的补充用于术前评估中低位直肠癌患者的CRM。 Objective To evaluate the value of transrectal ultrasound(ERUS)and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)in the preoperative diagnosis of peripheral margin(CRM)for middle and low rectal cancer.Methods The clinical data of 89 patients with rectal cancer treated in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2015 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.The relationship between clinicopathological factors and CRM involvement in middle and low rectal cancer was analyzed.Using postoperative pathology as the gold standard,the accuracy and diagnostic efficacy of CRM in preoperative assessment of low and middle rectal cancer by ERUS and MRI were analyzed.Results All the 89 patients had postoperative pathological results of rectal cancer,of which 77 were CRM-negative and 12 were CRM-positive,the positive rate was 13.48%(12/89).Pathological TN stage and extramural vascular invasion(EMVI)of rectal cancer were associated with CRM involvement in middle and low rectal cancer,with statistical significance(all P<0.05).Compared with the pathological results,the accuracy of ERUS preoperative assessment of CRM involvement was 88.76%(Kappa=0.578,P<0.001),the sensitivity was 75.00%,the specificity was 90.91%,the negative predictive value was 95.89%,the positive predictive value was 56.25%,and area under the curve(AUC)was 0.788.The accuracy rate of CRM involvement before MRI was 88.76%(Kappa=0.602,P<0.001),sensitivity was 83.33%,specificity was 89.61%,negative predictive value was 97.18%,positive predictive value was 55.56%,and AUC was 0.830.There was no significant difference in AUC between the two groups(Z=0.420,P=0.674).Conclusions ERUS and MRI have high accuracy in preoperative assessment of CRM status in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.ERUS can be used as a supplement to MRI for preoperative assessment of CRM in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.
作者 温悦 吴国柱 高越 Wen Yue;Wu Guozhu;Gao Yue(Department of Ultrasound,Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital,Hohhot O10017,China;Shenzhen Mindray Bio-medical Electronics Co.td.,Shenzhen 518000)
出处 《中国医师杂志》 CAS 2024年第11期1627-1631,共5页 Journal of Chinese Physician
基金 内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(2021MS08034) 内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(201702118):公立医院科研联合基金(2023GLLH0075)。
关键词 直肠肿瘤 切缘 经直肠超声 磁共振成像 Rectal neoplasms Margins of excision Endorectal ultrasonography Magnetic resonance imaging
作者简介 通信作者:吴国柱,Email:wuguozhu2001@126.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献112

  • 1Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferen- tial margin in the modem treatment of rectal cancer? [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26: 303-312.
  • 2Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee YC, et al. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal ex- cision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007, 14: 462-469.
  • 3Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, et al. Prognostic signifi- cance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [ J]. Br J Surg, 2002, 89 : 327-334.
  • 4Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. The TME tri- al after a median follow-up of 6 years : increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma [J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 246: 693-701.
  • 5Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, et al. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision [J]. Lancet, 1986, 2: 996-999.
  • 6Frasson M, Garcia-Granero E, Roda D, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation may not always be needed for patients with B and T2N+ rectal cancer [ J]. Cancer, 2011, 117: 3118-3125.
  • 7Burton S, Brown G, Daniels IR, et al. MRI directed multi- disciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins? [ J]. Br J Cancer, 2006, 94: 351-357.
  • 8MERCURY Study Group. Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: Results of the MERCURY study [J]. Radiology, 2007, 243: 132-139.
  • 9MERCURY Study Group. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: Prospective observational study [ J ]. BMJ,2006, 333: 779.
  • 10A1-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, et al. Diagnostic accura- cy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metasta- ses, and circumferential resection margin involvement in pa- tients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analy- sis [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19: 2212-2223.

共引文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部