摘要
在法学的知识系谱中,“情感”的形象总体上是纷乱、孱弱且消极的。但这样的形象并非从来便是如此。广义的“法学”对情感的阐释是长时段、多向度的。在前学科化时期,早期的立法者和哲学家从理念和经验上为法学的情感阐释传统提供了支撑。在学科化时期,出于自治知识系统建构的需要,法学家更强调法律理性对情感的规范评价,以及理性化的情感知识对法律教义的同化。在后学科化时期,法学在理性认知的既定图式之外,以延展性的“内—外”广角,在更开阔的知识场域中寻求情感阐释的主体动能及回应进路。对于法学的体系构造和功能发展而言,情感阐释不仅有丰富的规范和实践认知价值,而且还有隐而未发、至关紧要的知识论涵义。只有将理性与情感的对垒消解,以一种新知识论的整体均衡观为指引,法学方才有望合乎优雅的审美,由刚硬的命令之学转向表彰优美心灵的人性之学。
In the knowledge genealogy of jurisprudence, the image of “ Emotion” seems to be chaotic, weak and negative. But this image is not always so. A broad sense of “Jurisprudence” on the emotional interpretation is lengthy and multi-dimensional. In the pre-disciplinary period, early legislators and philosophers supported the emotional interpretation tradition of jurisprudence in terms of ideas and experiences. In order to construct autonomous knowledge system, modern jurisprudence emphasizes the normative evaluation of emotion by legal reason and the assimilation of rational emotional knowledge to legal doctrine in the period of discipline. In the post-disciplinary period, outside of the established schema of rational cognition, jurisprudence tries to seek the subject energy and response approach of emotional interpretation in a broader field of knowledge. As for the system structure and function development of jurisprudence, the emotional interpretation not only has rich normative and practical cognitive value, but also has implicit and essential meaning of knowledge theory. Only by dispelling the antagonism between reason and emotion and taking a new view of the whole equilibrium of knowledge as a guide, can jurisprudence be expected to conform to the elegant aesthetic, from the rigid discipline of command to the discipline of human nature, which commends the beauty of the soul.
作者
廖奕
Liao Yi(Wuhan University Law School)
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第5期31-44,191,共15页
The Jurist
基金
研究阐释党的十九届六中全会精神国家社科基金重点项目“弘扬社会主义法治精神研究”(22AZD058)的阶段性成果。
关键词
法学
“法律和情感”研究
情感阐释
学科化
知识论
Jurisprudence
"Law and Emotion"Research
Emotional Interpretation
Disciplinization
Theory of Knowledge
作者简介
廖奕,法学博士,武汉大学法学院教授。
