期刊文献+

论唐代判词中礼法关系对当代裁判文书的借鉴意义

On the Relevance of Ritual and Relations to Contemporary Judicial Instruments
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 判词在古代诉讼中相当于现在法院的裁判文书。唐代判词具有以情理说服和说理透彻两大特点,且具有较高的文学价值。由于我国目前的裁判文书具有格式刻板且说理不透、文采不足和缺乏情理等问题,而唐代判词注重以情说理、以典故说理、以道德说理和以文化说理,对我国裁判文书改革具有良好的借鉴意义。建议通过优化法律表达方式,学习唐代判词的逻辑清晰、寓情于理的表达方法,凸显法官的司法智慧等途径助力我国裁判文书改革。 Verdicts in ancient litigation served as the equivalent of modern courts'judgment documents.Tang Dynasty verdicts were characterized by persuasive emotional appeals and thorough reasoning,and also possessed significant literary merit.Given the issues in China's current judicial documents—such as rigid formatting,unclear reasoning,lack of literary grace,and absence of emotional reasoning—the Tang Dynasty's emphasis on reasoning with emotion,allusions,morality,and culture offers valuable insights for the reform of China's judicial document reforms.It is advisable to enhance legal expression methods,adopt the logical and emotional expression of Tang Dynasty verdicts,and emphasize the judicial wisdom of judges to aid in the reform of China's judicial documents.
作者 苏志佳 姚澍 SU Zhijia;YAO Shu(People's Public Security University of China,Beijing 100032,China;Institute of Information Intelligence,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China)
出处 《北京城市学院学报》 2024年第4期80-84,共5页 Journal of Beijing City University
基金 司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目(21SFB4012)。
关键词 唐代判词 礼法关系 裁判文书 法治建设 Tang Dynasty judgments The relationship between ritual and law Judgment documents Rule of law construction
作者简介 苏志佳(2000-),男,广西河池人,硕士,主要研究方向:侦查学;姚澍(1988-),男,湖南益阳人,讲师,博士,主要研究方向:法学理论。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献44

  • 1任平,欧阳康,冯平,鞠实儿.当代哲学研究的前沿问题(续):马克思“反思的问题视域”及其当代意义[J].中国社会科学,2006(6):35-40. 被引量:58
  • 2Plato, Theaetetus, translated with notes by John McDowell, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
  • 3Witt~enstein, Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001, pp. 68, 43.
  • 4肖尔兹.《简明逻辑史》,张家龙、吴可译,北京:商务印书馆,1977年,第6-25页.
  • 5J. A. Mortimer, "Logic, " in Great Books of the Western World, Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1990, pp. 798-810.
  • 6Susan Haack, Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1996, pp. 26-35.
  • 7托马斯·许兰德·埃里克森.《小地方,大论题一--社会文化人类学导论》,董薇译,北京:商务印书馆,2008年,第10页.
  • 8舍尔巴次基.《佛教逻辑》,宋力道等译,北京:商务印书馆,1997年,第1-2、365-368页.
  • 9亚里士多德.《工具论》,余纪元译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003年.
  • 10Michael A Gilbert, Coalescent Argumentation, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.

共引文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部