摘要
文章通过从法律层面解读探矿权的“申请在先”并将其与竞争性出让进行比较,探析“申请在先”具备的优势和可能的问题,以及“协议出让”在空白区的适用,提出空白区探矿权准入法律规制的建议:准入方式方面“申请在先”须限定于战略性紧缺矿产,空白区战略性非紧缺矿产适用“协议出让”;准入程序方面引入听证和集体会审制度;准入主体资质方面纳入对探矿权申请人司法品行的要求。
By interpreting the"application first"access method for exploration rights from the legal perspective and comparing it with the competitive transfer method,the paper analyzes the advantages and possible problems of the"application first"access method,as well as the applicability of the"agreement transfer"access method in the blank area.Further,the paper puts forward recommendations on the legal regulation of access to exploration rights in the blank areas:in terms of access method,"application first"access must be limited to strategic and critical minerals,and"agreement transfer"access should be applied to strategic non-shortage minerals in blank areas;in terms of access procedures,the system of hearings and collective hearings should be introduced;in terms of the qualifications of access subjects,the judicial conduct requirements to exploration right applicants shall be included.
作者
李显冬
林千琪
LI Xiandong;LIN Qianqi(China University of Geosciences(Beijing),Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《中国国土资源经济》
2024年第7期22-28,共7页
Natural Resource Economics of China
关键词
空白区
探矿权
申请在先
协议出让
战略性矿产资源
听证程序
司法品行
blank areas
exploration rights
application first
agreement transfer
strategic mineral resources
hearing process
judicial conduct
作者简介
李显冬(1951—),男,辽宁省辽中县人,中国地质大学(北京)特聘教授、中国政法大学国土资源法律研究中心主任、澳门科技大学博士生导师,民法学博士,主要从事矿产资源法学及民商法学研究;通讯作者:林千琪(2001—),女,吉林省镇赉县人,中国地质大学(北京)法学硕士研究生,主要从事民商法学研究。E-mail:389552122@qq.com。
