摘要
证据不等于事实。经验法则是从证据到事实推理过程中的重要连接工具。经验法则之所以能够在诉讼证明活动中成为重要工具,关键在于经验法则具有较强的客观性。经验法则的客观性决定了经验法则可在多场合反复复现、反复验证。通过案例解析,可以更好理解经验法则在命案办理中具有判断言词证据真假、排除不合理怀疑、强化指控效能的作用。
Evidence does not equal facts.The empirical rule is an important tool for connecting evidence to factual reasoning.The reason why empirical rules can become an important tool in litigation proof activities is that empirical rules have strong objectivity.The objectivity of empirical rules determines that they can be repeated and verified in multiple situations.Through case analysis,we can better understand the role of empirical rules in determining the authenticity of verbal evidence,eliminating unreasonable doubts and strengthening the effectiveness of accusations in handling homicide cases.
作者
蒋涤非
Jiang Difei(Yunnan Provincial People’s Procuratorate,Kunming Yunnan 650228,China)
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2024年第3期46-53,共8页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词
命案
证据审查
经验法则
homicide case
examination of evidence
empirical rule
作者简介
蒋涤非(1978-),男,云南昆明人,云南省人民检察院第二检察部副主任、三级高级检察官,法学博士,主要从事刑法学研究。
