期刊文献+

卵泡期长效长方案与黄体期短效长方案的临床结局比较

Clinical outcomes between long-acting long protocol in follicular phase versus short-acting long protocol in luteal phase
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 比较体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)卵泡期长效长方案与黄体期短效长方案新鲜移植周期的临床结局。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年12月在烟台市烟台山医院生殖医学中心行IVF-ET助孕的313例患者(313个周期)资料,根据其促排卵方案分成两组。卵泡期长效长方案组(A组,141个周期),年龄(31.59±3.00)岁,不孕年限(3.48±2.38)年;黄体期短效长方案组(B组,172个周期),年龄(31.42±3.03)岁,不孕年限(3.38±2.38)年。应用t检验及χ^(2)检验比较两种方案的临床结局。结果A组总促性腺激素(Gn)用量、Gn天数、人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)日内膜厚度均高于B组[(29.53±11.18)支比(23.83±7.03)支、(9.61±1.80)d比(8.44±1.26)d、(1.13±0.23)cm比(1.06±0.26)cm],差异均有统计学意义(t=5.49、6.75、2.44,均P<0.05);A组HCG日雌二醇(E2)、HCG日黄体生成素(LH)水平、获卵率、优胚率均低于B组[(2255.00±1417.75)ng/L比(2787.01±1285.11)ng/L、(1.56±1.34)mIU/ml D0I:10.3765.2024.09.015比(2.12±1.02)mIU/ml、81.00%(1522/1879)比84.74%(2043/2411)、38.31%(344/898)比48.22%(597/1238)],差异均有统计学意义(t=3.44、4.14,χ^(2)=10.50、20.76,均P<0.05);A组临床妊娠率、胚胎着床率高于B组[59.65%(68/114)比43.88%(43/98)、44.39%(87/196)比31.82%(56/176)],差异均有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.26、6.19,均P<0.05)。结论卵泡期长效长方案新鲜移植周期临床妊娠率和胚胎着床率均高于黄体期短效长方案。 Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of fresh transfer cycles of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer(IVF-ET)between follicular phase long-acting long protocol and luteal phase short-acting long protocol.Methods The data of 313 patients taking IVF-ET(313 cycles)at Reproductive Medicine Center,Yantaishan Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.The cycles were divided into a folicular phase long-acting long protocol group(group A;141 cycles)and a luteal phase short-acting long protocol group(group B;172 cycles)according to the controlled ovarian stimulation protocols.Group A were(31.59±3.00)years old,with(3.48±2.38)years of infertility.Group B were(31.42±3.03)years old,with(3.38±2.38)years of infertility.The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups by t andχ^(2) tests.Results The total dosage of gonadotropin(Gn),Gn days,and endometrial thickness on the human chorionic gonadotropin(HCG)administration day in group A were more than those in group B[(29.53±11.18)ones vs.(23.83±7.03)ones,(9.61±1.80)d vs.(8.44±1.26)d,and(1.13±0.23)cm vs.(1.06±0.26)cm],with statistical differences(t=5.49,6.75,and 2.44;all P<0.05).The levels of estrogen and luteinizing hormone(LH)on the HCG administration day,oocyte retrieved rate,and high-quality embryo rate in group A were lower than those in group B[(2255.00±1417.75)ng/L vs.(2787.01±1285.11)ng/L,(1.56±1.34)mIU/ml vs.(2.12±1.02)mIU/ml,81.00%(1522/1879)vs.84.74%(2043/2411),and 38.31%(344/898)vs.48.22%(597/1238)],with statistical differences(t=3.44 and 4.14;χ^(2)=10.50 and 20.76;all P<0.05).The clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate in group A were higher than those in group B[59.65%(68/114)vs.43.88%(43/98)and 44.39%(87/196)vs.31.82%(56/176)],with statistical differences(χ^(2)=5.26 and 6.19;all P<0.05).Conclusion The clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate of fresh transfer cycles are higher by the follicular phase long-acting long protocol than by the luteal phase short-acting long protocol.
作者 孙雪艳 张爱玉 王辉 Sun Xueyan;Zhang Aiyu;Wang Hui(Reproductive Medicine Center,Yantaishan Hospital,Yantai 264000,China)
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2024年第9期1473-1477,共5页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 体外受精-胚胎移植 卵泡期长效长方案 黄体期短效长方案 临床妊娠率 胚胎着床率 In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer Folicular phase long-acting long protocol Luteal phase short-acting long protocol Clinical pregnancy rate Embryo implantation rate
作者简介 通信作者:孙雪艳,Email:2041138503@qq.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献125

  • 1朱桂金,靳镭,李豫峰.4种短效达必佳降调节方案诱发排卵效果比较[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(4):209-211. 被引量:17
  • 2李洁,周灿权,钟依平,欧建平,林雯青,庄广伦.不同小剂量促性腺激素释放激素激动剂在体外受精-胚胎移植中应用的比较[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(4):269-270. 被引量:39
  • 3Pratol LD, Borini A, Coticehiol G, et al. Half-dose depot triptorelin in pituitary suppression for multiple ovarian stimulation in assisted re- production technology: a randomized study[ J ]. Hum Reprod, 2004, 19 (10) :2200 - 2205.
  • 4Forman RG, Demouzon J, Feinstein MC, et al. Studies on the influence of gonadotrophin levels in the early follicular phase on the ovarian re- sponse to stimulation[J]. Hum Reprod, 1991,6(1) :113 -117.
  • 5Dadal T, Salha O, Baillie HS, et al. A comparison of three gonado- trophin-releasing hormone analogues in an in-vitro fertilization pro- gramme: a prospective randomized study [ J ]. Hum Reprod, 1999, 14(2) :288 -293.
  • 6Leili S, Farncosh SM, Ashraf A, et al. Clinical outcome with half-dose depot triptorelin is the same as reduced-dose daily buserelin in a long protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation for ICSl/embryo transfer: a randomized double-blind clinical trial [ J ]. Hum Reprod, 2007, 22 (9) : 2449 - 2454.
  • 7Silverberg KM, Bums WN, Olive DL, et al. Serum progesterone lev- els predict success of in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in patients stimulated with leuprolide acetate and human menopausal gonadotro- Dins~- J1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1991. 73 (4) : 797 - 803.
  • 8Richard F, Julian J. The source and implications of progesterone rise during the follicular phase of assisted reproduction cycles[ J]. Reprod Bio Med Online, 2010, 21 (4):446-449.
  • 9Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, et al. Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization : analysis of over 4000 cycles [ J ]. Hum Re- prod, 2010, 25(8) : 2092 -2100.
  • 10Palermo R, Amodeo G, Navot D, et al. Concomitant gonadotropin -releasing hormone agonist and menotropin treatment for the synchronized induction of multiple follicles[J]. Fertil Steril, 1988,49(2): 290-295.

共引文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部