摘要
20世纪后期,索恩森从相对性的视角提出了盲点方案。该方案同摩尔方案之间的差异在于,集中表达了摩尔悖论形成机制源于断言背后的信念结构而非语言内容,揭示了摩尔悖论具有基于信念不一致与明显诉诸认知主体和时间因素的特质;而摩尔方案则更多地只是在言语行为的框架内部设置两个原则用以解释摩尔式荒谬。因此,盲点方案针对于任何由信念之需求导致的结构缺陷而造成的摩尔悖论,而摩尔方案的使用必须在那些形如省略形式和承诺形式的开放式语句中进行。盲点方案的独特价值在于,不仅有助于对悖论形成机理的认识,而且还能为ChatGPT的幻觉问题提供启发性的解题思路,即检索、锚定和替换嵌入在参数化知识中的相关信息。
In the late 2oth century,Sorenson proposed the Blindspot scheme from the perspective of relativity.The difference between this scheme and Moore's scheme is that the formation mechanism of Moore's paradox is derived from the belief structure behind the assertion rather than the language content,which reveals that Moore's paradox is based on the inconsistency of belief and appeals to the cognitive subject and time factors,while the Moore's scheme is more just a way of setting up two principles inside the framework of the verbal act for explaining the Moorean absurdity.Thus,the Blindspot scheme addresses Moore's paradox,which is caused by any structural defect caused by the need for belief,and the use of Moore's scheme must be carried out in the form of open-ended statements such as omissive and commitment.The unique value of the Blindspot scheme is that it not only contributes to the understanding of the mechanism of paradox formation,but also provides an enlightening solution to the hallucination problem of ChatGPT,i.e.,retrieving,anchoring,and replacing relevant information embedded in parameterized knowledge.
作者
史红继
SHI Hong-ji(Department of Philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第3期38-44,共7页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“广义逻辑悖论的历史发展、理论前沿与跨学科应用研究”(18ZDA031)。
作者简介
史红继(1992-),河南商丘人,南京大学哲学系博士生,主要研究方向:现代逻辑与逻辑哲学、一般科学哲学。
