期刊文献+

体素内不相干运动成像定量评估慢性移植肾功能不全 被引量:1

Intravoxel incoherent motion for quantitative evaluating chronic allograft dysfunction
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察弥散加权成像体素内不相干运动(IVIM)定量评估慢性移植肾功能不全(CAD)的价值。方法前瞻性纳入104例CAD患者,根据估算肾功能受损程度分为CAD 1、2、3组(n=11、61、32);另以36名健康志愿者为对照组。比较组间及组内肾皮、髓质IVIM参数真性弥散系数(D值)、微循环灌注弥散系数(D值)及灌注分数(f值),评价IVIM参数诊断CAD的价值。结果移植肾皮质D值在各CAD组均低于对照组(P均<0.05),且在1组、2组、3组依序减低(P均<0.05);CAD 2组、3组移植肾髓质D值均低于对照组(P均<0.05)。各CAD组移植肾皮质D值均低于对照组(P均<0.05),CAD 2组、3组肾髓质D值均低于对照组(P均<0.05)。CAD 2组、3组移植肾皮质、髓质f值均低于对照组(P均<0.05),CAD 3组移植肾皮质f值低于1组及2组(P均<0.05)。各组肾皮质D值、D值、f值均高于髓质(P均<0.05)。皮质IVIM联合模型诊断CAD的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.96,优于D值及f值(AUC=0.74、0.83,P均<0.05)而与D值(AUC=0.94)差异无统计学意义(P=0.32)。髓质IVIM联合模型诊断CAD的AUC为0.91,优于D值、D值及f值(AUC=0.80、0.67、0.80,P均<0.05)。结论IVIM参数可定量评估CAD。 Objective To observe the value of diffusion weighted imaging intravoxel incoherent motion(IVIM)for quantitative evaluating chronic allograft dysfunction(CAD).Methods Totally 104 CAD patients were prospectively enrolled and were assigned into CAD 1,2 and 3 groups(n=11,61,32)based on impairment severity of estimated renal function,and 36 healthy volunteers were enrolled as control group.The true diffusion coefficient(D value),microcirculation perfusion diffusion coefficient(D value)and perfusion score(f value)of renal cortex and medulla IVIM parameters were compared among groups and within groups to assess the value of IVIM parameters for diagnosing CAD.Results The D value of transplanted renal cortex in all CAD groups were lower than that in control group(all P<0.05),which decreased among CAD 1,2 and 3 groups(all P<0.05).The D value of transplanted kidney medulla in CAD 2 and 3 groups were lower than that in control group(both P<0.05).The D values of transplanted renal cortex in all CAD groups were lower than that in control group,while of renal medulla in CAD 2 and 3 groups were lower than that in control group(both P<0.05).The f values of cortex and medulla in CAD 2 and 3 groups were lower than those in control group(all P<0.05),while of cortex in CAD 3 group was lower than that in CAD 1 and 2 groups(both P<0.05).The area under the curve(AUC)of cortical IVIM combined model for diagnosing CAD was 0.96,better than the D value and f value(AUC=0.74,0.83,P<0.05)but not significantly different with that of the D value(AUC=0.94,P=0.32).AUC of medullary IVIM combined model for diagnosing CAD was 0.91,better than that of D,D and f value(AUC=0.80,0.67 and 0.80,all P<0.05).Conclusion IVIM parameters could be used to quantitatively evaluate CAD.
作者 王盼 李向南 郑鑫 胡小鹏 张琛 蒋涛 李敏 WANG Pan;LI Xiangnan;ZHENG Xin;HU Xiaopeng;ZHANG Chen;JIANG Tao;LI Min(Department of Radiology,Beijing Fangshan District First Hospital,Beijing 102400,China;Department of Radiology,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100020,China;Urinary Surgery,Beijing Youan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China;Urinary Surgery,Beijing Chaoyang Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100020,China;MR Research Collaboration Team,Siemens Healthcare,Beijing 100102,China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第1期93-97,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 肾移植 肾功能不全 慢性 磁共振成像 前瞻性研究 kidney transplantation renal insufficiency,chronic magnetic resonance imaging prospective studies
作者简介 第一作者:王盼(1989-),女,河北保定人,本科,主治医师。研究方向:肾脏功能磁共振研究。E-mail:296477725@qq.com;通信作者:李敏,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院放射科,100020。E-mail:limin84924@126.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献60

  • 1许玉峰,王霄英,蒋学祥.肾脏ADC值与滤过功能相关性的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(6):941-943. 被引量:11
  • 2Nankivell B J,Chapman JR,Gruenewald SM.Detection of chronic allograft nephropathy by quantitative Doppler imaging.Transplantation,2002,74:90-96.
  • 3Kellar H,Nolodge G,Wilms G,et al.Incidence,diagnosis and treatment of ureteric stenosis in 1928 renal transplant patients.Transplant Int,1994,7:253-256.
  • 4Hunsicker LG,Bennett LE.Acute rejection reduces creatinine clearance at 6 months following renal transplantation but does not affect subsequent slope of Ccr.Transplantation,1999,67:S83-88.
  • 5Gourishankar S,Hunsicker LG,Jhangri GS,et al.The stability of the glomerular filtration rate after renal transplantation is improving.J Am Soc Nephrol,2003,14:2387-2394.
  • 6Briganti EM,Russ GR,McNeil JJ,et al.Risk of renal allograft loss from recurrent glomerulonephritis.N Engl J Med,2002,347:103-109.
  • 7Hariharan S,Adams MB,Brennan DC,et al.Recurrent and de novo glomerular disease after renal transplantation:A report from Renal Allograft Disease Registry (RADR).Transplantation,1999,68:635-641.
  • 8Hirsch HH,Knowles W,Dickenmann M,et al.Prospective study of polyomavirus type BK replication and nephropathy in renal transplant recipients.N Engl J Med,2002,347:488-496.
  • 9Mullee M,Mason JC,Peveler RC.Frequency and impact of non-adherence to immunosuppressants following renal transplantation:A systematic review.Transplantation,2004,77:769-776.
  • 10Racusen LC,Solez K,Colvin RB,et al.The Banff 97 Working Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology.Kidney Int,1999,55:713-723.

共引文献49

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部