摘要
康德与王阳明道德哲学中的“至善”理念在目的论意义上具有一致性,均为道德实践的终极目标,而在本体论与方法论意义上则具有明显差异。康德将“至善”作为实践理性的先验指向,其“至善”理念中包含了幸福在内,因而不得不将其作为彼岸的悬设,康德抵达至善的途径是从外至内再向外(外-内-外)的追求;王阳明将“至善”作为心之先验本体,其“至善”理念继承了理学传统,立足于此岸,他的致良知则是由外向内的追溯。通过分析两者关于“至善”理念异同的原因,以期为推进人类命运共同体构建提供伦理参考。
In the moral philosophy of Kant and Wang Yangming,“Summum Bonum”,as the ultimate goal of moral practice,is consistent examined from the skopos theory.However,there are obvious differences examined from ontology and methodology.Kant regards“Summum Bonum”as the transcendental orientation towards the practical reason,his notion including happiness,so it has to be looked upon as the suspension of“the opposite bank”;Wang Yangming regards“Summum Bonum”as the transcendental noumenon of mind,his notion inherited from the Neo-Confucianism tradition based on“this shore’.Kant’s exploration to reach“Summum Bonum”is from the outside to the inside and then back to the outside again(outside-inside-outside),while Wang Yangming’s“To the conscience”is from the outside to the inside.By analyzing the reasons of the similarities and dissimilarities between the two notions,the paper attempts to provide an ethical basis for promoting the construction of a Community of Shared Future for Mankind.
作者
尚大江
宗元勇
SHANG Dajiang;ZONG Yuanyong(School of Marxism,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210000)
出处
《绍兴文理学院学报》
2023年第7期24-29,共6页
Journal of Shaoxing University
关键词
至善
康德
王阳明
致良知
人类命运共同体
Summum Bonum
Kant
Wang Yangming
to the conscience
a Community of Shared Future for Mankind
作者简介
尚大江(2000-),男,甘肃庆阳人,南京工业大学马克思主义学院2021级硕士研究生,研究方向:历史唯物主义、中国特色社会主义、康德。E-mail:806969265@qq.com;宗元勇(1963-),男,江苏淮安人,南京工业大学马克思主义学院副教授,研究方向:高等教育、哲学、企业经济。E-mail:zyyong@126.com。
