摘要
《博物要览》一书自清代中叶以来一直被陶瓷、文玩、矿产、冶金等领域的学者不断征引,但这部被众多学者引用的《博物要览》并非作者谷泰的原本,而是一部经过了重新整理的改编本。这部改编本共12卷,原题《骨董志》,收录于清代李调元所编丛书《函海》中。嘉庆间重刻时挖改书名与作者,易名为《博物要览》。谷泰原作共16卷,仅存抄本,素材多来自《墨池编》、《遵生八笺》、《本草纲目》等书,此外也记载了一些独有的技术与方法,体现着它的价值所在。两种版本的《博物要览》在文字内容上存在一定差异,各具特色,编修水平难分轩轾。二者在后世的流传一显一晦,与其文本的物质形态以及刊刻刷印的频次与数量紧密相关。
From the middle of the Qing dynasty,the Bowu yaolan(博物要览,Conspectus of Nature Products and Antiques)was regularly cited by relevant scholars in the fields of casting,ceramics and metallurgy.In fact,the current twelve-section edition of the work is not the original version compiled by Gu Tai(谷泰),but is,rather,a“re-edited”book.Originally named Gudongzhi(骨董志,Record of Antiques),and included in the Han hai(函海,Seas of Books)series compiled by Li Diaoyuan(李调元)in the late 18 th century,it was renamed Bowu yaolan during the period of the Emperor Jiaqing(1796-1820).Gu Tai s original version comprised sixteen sections,and only survives in manuscript form.Most of its content came from three books:Mochibian(墨池编),Zunsheng bajian(遵生八笺,Eight Key Points of Life-Cultivation)and Bencao gangmu(本草纲目,Compendium of Materia Medica).However,it does record some unique techniques and methods,reflecting its value.The two editions of Bowu yaolan are quite different in content but matched in terms of editing.The differences between their subsequent impact on later scholars is not only directly related to the material form of the texts,but also closely related to the frequency and quantity of printing.
作者
逯铭昕
LU Mingxin(Shandong Normal University Library,Jinan 250014,China)
出处
《自然科学史研究》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第1期64-74,共11页
Studies in The History of Natural Sciences
关键词
《博物要览》
编撰
流传
Bowu yaolan(博物要览,Conspectus of Nature Products and Antiques)
editions
influence
作者简介
逯铭昕,1983年生,山东淄博人,副研究馆员,主要研究方向为版本目录学、中医医史文献,Email:lumingxin@126.com。
