摘要
生态学马克思主义者泰德·本顿和保罗·伯克特关于马克思是否有“自然极限”的思想展开了激烈争论。本顿将马克思思想误判为以生产力为主导的工业主义意识形态,并认为马克思没有自然极限思想。伯克特则通过分析马克思对马尔萨斯的批判,区分马克思人类生产的自然条件,辨析马克思劳动过程的生态调节,指出本顿对马克思的理解出现了较大的偏差。在伯克特看来,马克思所认为的自然极限是在具体生产关系下劳动的边界,人们在这个边界内进行“自然创造”获取财富。而这种自然创造的思想无疑比本顿所理解的自然极限思想更为深刻。梳理反思伯克特与本顿的争论,有助于加深对马克思自然创造思想的理解,厘清生态学马克思主义领域的争论,为我国生态文明建设提供重要的理论资源。
Ecological Marxists Ted Benton and Paul Burkett had a heated debate about whether Marx had“natural limits”.Benton misjudged Marx's thought as an industrialist ideology dominated by productive forces and held that Marx had no thought of natural limits.By analyzing Marx's criticism of Malthus,distinguishing Marx's natural conditions of human production,and discriminating Marx's ecological adjustment of labor process,Burkett pointed out that Bentons understanding of Marx had a big deviation.In Burkett's view,Marx's natural limits is the boundary of labor under the concrete relations of production,within which people carry out“spontaneously provided by Nature”to obtain wealth.This idea of“spontaneously provided by Nature”is undoubtedly more profound than the idea of natural limits understood by Benton.Combing and rethinking the debate between Burkett and Benton is helpful to deepen the understanding of Marx's thought of“spontaneously provided by Nature”,clarify the debate in the field of ecological Marxism,and provide important theoretical resources for the construction of Chinese ecological civilization.
作者
熊易文
孙玉忠
Xiong Yiwen;Sun Yuzhong
出处
《理论月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第5期48-55,共8页
Theory Monthly
基金
2022年哈尔滨师范大学研究生创新项目“保罗·伯克特的‘人类可持续发展’思想研究”(HSDBSCX2022-104)。
关键词
自然极限
自然创造
本顿
伯克特
生态学马克思主义
natural limits
spontaneously provided by Nature
Benton
Burkett
ecological Marxism
作者简介
熊易文(1994-),女,哈尔滨师范大学马克思主义学院博士研究生;孙玉忠(1964-),女,哲学博士,哈尔滨师范大学马克思主义学院教授、博士生导师。
