摘要
指出“建筑通史”在20世纪晚期之后的发展中所面对问题的根源是处在历史学与建筑学两种知识制度中的,受整合与分散两种不同取向驱使的认识论分歧。进而从范式选择、论证形式、叙事框架等方面,分别讨论了风格史与建造史等基本类型,文化史与全球史等重要路径,以及其中涉及的分类与分期等历史编纂的实践操作。最后,提出一种以理论假说结合经验研究的写作方式,并建议将其视作“建筑通史”这种学科论述体系可能的方法论。
This paper argues that the root cause of crisis of “General History of Architecture” since the late 20th century is not a simple shift of research interest from macro history to micro history, but the distinctions in epistemology between two kinds of knowledge institutions of “History” and “Architecture”,driven by different intentions of “integration” and “dispersion”.It then discusses the primary types such as “style history” and “construction history” from the aspects of paradigm selection,formal argument, historiographical framework, etc., and identifies the important approaches such as “cultural history”and “global history”, including some relative historiographical operations such as “classification” and “periodization”. In conclusion, it tentatively proposes a writing methodology based on the theoretical hypothesis combined with empirical research, considering “General History of Architecture” as a disciplinary discourse system.
作者
王为
夏铸九
WANG Wei;XIA Zhujiu
出处
《建筑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期91-97,共7页
Architectural Journal
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(52178035)。
关键词
建筑史
建筑通史
建筑学
历史学
史学理论
architectural history
general history of architecture
architecture
history
theories of historiography
