摘要
“哲学终结论”提出了一个自我否定的问题,即“哲学是否有未来”。对这个问题的不同回答,都预设了哲学以未来作为自己性质的规定。通过分析表明,与其他学科相比,哲学是唯一面向未来的科学。通过对哲学史研究、哲学问题研究以及比较哲学研究的性质和范围的说明,我们可以揭示,以未来规定哲学的性质应当被看作哲学研究的基本内容。从未来的视角看,哲学确实具有不可取代的预言性特征。一切未来所具有的基本特征正是哲学研究的品质所在,而哲学也正是以这样的品质开启对未来的邀请。未来的基本特征包括了“不确定性”“不可预见性”和“无限开放性”等,这些都规定了未来与过去和现在的明显分别,也表征了哲学的特殊性质。历史已经多次表明,哲学家们在对哲学性质的刻画中总是把自己的哲学看作未来哲学的一种可能形式。
The claim on The End of Philosophy raises the self-defeated question“Does philosophy have its future?”Different answers to this question presuppose the premise that philosophy regards the future as its own nature.The analysis shows that,compared to other disciplines,philosophy is the only future-oriented science.With the description of nature and scope of research on the history of philosophy,the research on philosophical issues and the research on comparative philosophy,this paper reveals that defining the nature of philosophy in the future should be regarded as the basic content of philosophical research.From the perspective of the future,philosophy does have an irreplaceable prophetic character.The basic characteristic of all future is the quality of philosophical research,and it is with this quality that philosophy opens its invitation to the future.According to this analysis,the basic characteristics of the future include“uncertainty”,“unpredictability”and“infinite openness”,all defining the obvious difference between the future,the past and the present,and representing the special nature of philosophy.History has shown time and again that philosophers,in their characterization of the nature of philosophy,always see their own philosophy as a possible form of the future philosophy.
出处
《社会科学战线》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期1-9,281,共10页
Social Science Front
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(19AZX013)。
作者简介
江怡,山西大学哲学社会学学院教授,研究方向:西方哲学史、维特根斯坦哲学、分析哲学史、语言哲学、认知科学哲学。
