期刊文献+

“家校卫融合”模式对深圳市光明区学生伤害结果的影响 被引量:1

The impact of inclusive education which integrated home,school and health care institutions on the injury outcome of students in Guangming District,Shenzhen
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解“家校卫融合”模式对中小学生伤害发生和结果的影响,为制定中小学生伤害预防与干预政策提供科学依据。方法采用分层整群抽样方法,抽取深圳市光明区已采用“家校卫融合”模式运作的3所哨点学校2019学年(2019年9月1日―2020年8月31日)11439名中小学生,与干预模式实施前的2014学年(2014年9月1日―2015年8月31日)3所学校8056名中小学生的伤害数据作为对照进行比较,采用SPSS 21.0软件进行统计分析,定性资料采用频率描述,组间比较使用χ^(2)检验,等级资料组间比较使用非参数检验。结果2019学年光明区学校报告年平均伤害发生率为19.86%,男生伤害发生率为24.54%,女生伤害发生率为13.89%;小学伤害发生率最高,为35.01%;伤害发生时最主要的状态是活动娱乐/玩耍/休闲,占比60.40%;伤害类型主要表现为跌倒/坠落伤、钝器伤,分别占比57.39%、30.85%;伤害部位以膝部、头部为主,分别占比19.76%、15.76%;挫伤、擦伤是最主要的伤害后果,占比64.13%;与2014学年相比,2019学年学生轻度伤害比例提升,中度和重度比例下降,差异具有统计学意义(Z=-51.88,P<0.001)。结论“家校卫融合”模式促进了家庭、学校、医疗卫生机构的在学校卫生工作各方面的有效协同,提高了中小学生伤害监测的敏感度。 Objective To understand the impact of inclusive education which integrated home,school and health care institutions on the occurrence and outcome of injuries among primary and middle school students,and to provide a scientific basis for the development of student injury prevention and intervention policies.Methods A stratified cluster sampling was used to select 11439 primary and secondary school students who had adopted the inclusive education model in 2019 from 3 sentinel schools in Guangming District of Shenzhen City.The injury data of 8056 students from 3 schools in 2014 before the implementation of the intervention model were used for comparison.Qualitative data are described by frequency,and the chi-square test was used for comparison between groups.The nonparametric test was used for the comparison of hierarchical data between groups.SPSS 21.0 software was used for statistical analysis.Results In 2019,the average incidence of injuries reported by schools in Guangming District was 19.86%.The incidence of injuries in boys(24.54%)was higher than in girls(13.89%).The primary school had the highest injury rate(35.01%).The most common injuries were recreation/play/leisure(60.40%).The main injury types were fall/fall injury(57.39%)and blunt injury(30.85%).The main injury sites were the knee(19.76%)and head(15.76%).Contusions and abrasions(64.13%)were the main injury consequences.Compared with 2014,the proportion of students with mild injuries increased in 2019,while the proportion of moderate and severe injuries decreased,with statistical significance(Z=-51.88,P<0.001).Conclusions The inclusive education model promotes effective coordination among families,schools and health institutions in school health work,and improves the sensitivity and response of injury monitoring for primary and secondary school students.
作者 朱中平 管新艳 黄丽萍 ZHU Zhong-ping;GUAN Xin-yan;HUANG Li-ping(Hospital Social Management Center,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenzhen 518106,China;Public Health Surveillance Department of Guangming Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Shenzhen 518106,China)
出处 《中华疾病控制杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第4期477-482,共6页 Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention
基金 深圳市科技创新委员会科研项目(2020-6235号)。
关键词 创伤和损伤 人群监测 学生 Wounds and injuries Population surveillance Student
作者简介 通讯作者:朱中平,E-mail:zzp801@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献70

  • 1刘娜,杨功焕,马杰民,陈爱平.中国人群2002年与伤害有关行为的分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(10):746-750. 被引量:53
  • 2陈天娇,季成叶,星一,胡佩瑾,宋逸.中国18省市中学生伤害现状及危险因素分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2007,28(2):154-156. 被引量:62
  • 3朱善宽,MA Xiao-guang,Kenneth Heng.伤害是可以预测和预防的吗?(英文)[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2007,16(10):1013-1016. 被引量:6
  • 4WHO. Global burden of disease: 2004 update [ M ]. Geneva: WHO, 2008.
  • 5HUGHES K,MCHALE P,WYKE S,et al.Child injury:Using national emergency department monitoring systems to identify temporal and de- mographic risk factors[ J] .Inj Prey,2014,20(2) :74-80,.
  • 6LODER RT,ABRAMS S.Temporal variation in childhood injury from common recreational activities [ J ] .Injury, 2011,42 (9) : 945-957.
  • 7WOODS AJ.The role of health professionals in childhood injury pre- vention : A systematic review of the literature [ J ]. Patient Edu Couns, 2006,64(1-3) :35-42.
  • 8VELEMINSKY M,PRUCHOVA D,VITOSOVA A,et aLThe relation- ship between family socioeconomic condition and childhood injury fre- quency in selected locations in the Czech Republic [ J ]. Med Sci Monit,2012,18 (3) :19-27.
  • 9SIMPSON JC, NICHOLLS J.Preventing unintentional childhood injury at home:Injury circumstances and interventions [ J ] .Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot, 2012,19(2) : 141-151.
  • 10段蕾蕾,邓晓,吴春眉,李思杰,蒋炜,吴凡.2006-2008年全国伤害监测病例分布特征分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2010,31(8):880-884. 被引量:83

共引文献54

同被引文献18

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部