摘要
数字化记忆是互联网信息时代的重要表征。“被遗忘权”制度的提出,突显了公众对“过度记忆”这一时代发展趋势的抗拒。但是,“被遗忘权”在本土化移植问题上面临着权利实施必要性、权利实现可行性双重困境。一方面,“被遗忘权”所欲保护的利益与我国《个人信息保护法》中“删除权”所涵摄之内容重叠;另一方面,“被遗忘权”的引入会影响公众言论自由权及知情权的行使,危害良性社会秩序的建立。同时,由于“被遗忘权”的权利内容过于宽泛,易被异化为一种“特权”,从而影响互联网信息的流动,抑制我国信息产业的发展。因此,我国目前不宜引入“被遗忘权”。
Digital memory is an important representation of the Internet information age.The introduction of the"right to be forgotten"system highlights the public's resistance to the trend of"excessive memory",the development trend of the times.However,the"right to be forgotten"faces the dual dilemma of the necessity of rights implementation and the possibility of realizing rights on the issue of localization and transplantation.On the one hand,the interests to be protected by the"right to be forgotten"overlap with the content covered by the"right to erasure"in China's"Personal Information Protection Law";on the other hand,the introduction of the"right to be forgotten"will affect the exercise of the public's right to freedom of expression and the right to know,and endanger the establishment of a benign social order.At the same time,because the content of the"right to be forgotten"is too broad,it is easy to be alienated into a"privilege",thereby affecting the fl ow of Internet information and inhibiting the development of China's information industry.Therefore,it is not appropriate for our country to introduce the"right to be forgotten"at this time.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2022年第1期13-22,共10页
Electronics Intellectual Property
基金
高等学校学科创新引智计划(项目编号:B156058)。
关键词
大数据
被遗忘权
利益平衡
言论自由
个人信息
Big Data
Right to be Forgotten
Balance of Interests
Freedom of Expression
Personal Information
作者简介
衲钦,中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心博士研究生。
