期刊文献+

马克思主义阶级理论视角下统一战线的“一致性”与“多样性”研究 被引量:6

The Consistency and Diversity of the United Front from the Perspective of Marxist Class Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 马克思主义阶级理论是无产阶级统一战线建立的内在依据。纵观中国共产党领导的统一战线的发展历程,革命-爱国-复兴这条逻辑主线贯穿其中。在聚焦生产关系、揭露社会本质的马克思主义阶级结构理论视角下,革命统一战线是一个具有二分结构的救国联盟,其一致性在于斗争目标,其多样性在于属性定位;在着眼群体利益、反映社会现实的马克思主义阶级构成理论视角下,爱国统一战线是一个具有多层构成的民族整体,其一致性在于思想根基,其多样性在于利益诉求;在坚守底线原则、包容社会差异性的马克思主义完整阶级理论视角下,复兴统一战线是一个具有复合体系的人类世界,其一致性在于权利义务,其多样性在于行为主体。 Marxist class theory is the inherent basis for the establishment of the united proletarian front. Throughout the development of the united front led by the CPC,the logical thread of revolution-patriotism-rejuvenation runs through the course. From the perspective of Marxist class structure theory which focuses on the relations of production and exposes the essence of society,the revolutionary united front is an alliance for national salvation with a dichotomous structure,whose consistency lies in the goals of struggle and whose diversity lies in the positioning of its attributes;from the perspective of Marxist class composition theory which focuses on the interests of groups and reflects the social reality,the patriotic united front is the whole of the nation with a multi-layered composition,whose consistency lies in the ideological foundation and whose diversity lies in the interest appeal;from the perspective of Marxist complete class theory which adheres to the principle of bottom line and accommodates social differences,the rejuvenation united front is the human world with a composite system,whose consistency lies in rights and obligations and whose diversity lies in the subjects of behavior.
作者 何虎生 He Husheng
出处 《马克思主义研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第7期115-123,164,共10页 Studies on Marxism
基金 北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心重大项目“习近平总书记关于统一战线重要论述研究”(20LLZZA002) 中国人民大学“中华民族共同体研究基地”的阶段性成果。
作者简介 何虎生(1962-),中国人民大学马克思主义学院教授、博士生导师,中国人民大学中共党史党建研究院副院长(北京100872)。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献29

  • 1《马克思恩格斯全集》,第6卷,北京:人民出版社,1961.
  • 2《列宁全集》第27卷,北京:人民出版社,1990年,第403页.
  • 3理查德·斯凯思.《阶级》,长春:吉林人民出版社,2005年.
  • 4R. Nisbet, "The Decline and Fall of Social Class, " Pacific Sociological Review, 1959, vol. 2,no. 1, pp. 11-17.
  • 5D. Bell, The Coming of Post-industrial Society, New York: Basic Books, 1973.
  • 6T. N. Clark, S.M.Lipset, "Are Social Class Dying?" in D.J. Lee, B.S. Turner, eds., Conflict about Class, New York: Longman Publishing, 1996, p. 42.
  • 7R. Pahl,"Is the Emperor Naked?" in D.J. Lee, B.S. Turner, eds. , Conflict about Class, pp. 89-97.
  • 8Scott Lash, John Urry, The End of Organized Capitalism, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987, pp.5-6.
  • 9Donald Sassoon, One Hundred Years of Socialism, London: I. B. Tauris, 1996, pp. 655-656.
  • 10Malcolm Waters, "Succession in the Stratification System, " in D.J. Lee, B.S. Turner, eds. , Conflict about Class, pp. 71-83.

共引文献378

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部