摘要
通过工程布置、引水、冲沙效果、运行管理及投资等方面综合分析比较,文章中方案三(拦河闸坝式)具有布置简单、枢纽工程量较小、引水条件好、河道小流量冲砂效果较好、工程投资少以及后期运行安全、管理方便等优势,故渠首除险加固方案采用拦河闸坝式取水枢纽。
Through the comprehensive analysis and comparison of project layout,water diversion,and washing effect,operation management and investment etc,scheme 3( River Barrage type) is obtained. t has the advantages of simple layout,small project amount,good water diversion conditions,good sand washing effect with small river flow,less project investment and safe operation in the later period and convenient management. Therefore,the River Barrage type of water intake hub is adopted in the hazard removal and reinforcement scheme.
作者
于志昂
YU Zhiang(Changji Fanghui Hydropower Design Co.,Ltd.Changji 831100,China)
出处
《河南水利与南水北调》
2021年第5期60-61,共2页
Henan Water Resources & South-to-North Water Diversion
关键词
渠首选
枢纽布置
方案比选
canal preferred
hub layout
scheme comparison
作者简介
于志昂(1985-),男,工程师,主要从事水利水电工程设计工作。
