摘要
心身问题研究中有一个争议久而未决:一种观点坚持心身间的随附关系,即心灵随附于身体;另一种观点则坚持心身间的因果关系,即心身之间存在因果作用。要解决这一争议,首先就要辨明随附关系和因果关系。心身间的随附关系是就“身不变心亦不变”的伴随关系而言的,心身间的因果关系是就“身心共变”的互动关系而言的,二者的视角并不相同,也不矛盾。结合心身医学的研究来看,心身间的随附关系与因果关系是共存和互补的,即心身同在、心身互动。因此在医学实践中,就要注意整体诊疗、心身同治。
An unresolved controversy in the study of the mind-body problem is that the mind-body relationship should be supervenience,the mind supervenes on the body,or should be causal,there is causation between the mind and the body.The first step to mediate in this debate is to distinguish between supervenience and causation.The mind-body supervenience is about the co-invariant relationship between the mind and the body,while the causation is about the co-variant relationship of their interactions,so they are neither identical nor contradictory.Based on the psychosomatic medicine research,the supervenience and causation of the mind-body relationship could be coexisting and complementary,the mind supervenens on the body,besides,they are interactive.Therefore,it is important for doctors to give an integral therapy to treat both the patient's body and mind.
作者
季士强
JI Shi-qiang(School of Marxism,Guangdong Mechanical&Electrical College,Guangzhou 510515,China)
出处
《医学与哲学》
北大核心
2021年第14期53-56,共4页
Medicine and Philosophy
基金
2018年国家社会科学基金项目(18BZX040)
2018年广东省教育科学规划“十三五”课题(2018JKSJD55)。
关键词
心身问题
随附性
因果性
共变性
互补性
the mind-body problem
supervenience
causation
co-variation
complementary
作者简介
季士强(1970-),男,博士,副教授,研究方向:科学技术哲学。E-mail:jshq45@126.com。
