摘要
[目的/意义]我国图情领域目前正处于学科功能转变的阶段,研究范式差异明显,引起广泛的讨论。研究旨在发现学科哲学范式与数据范式各自存在的逻辑断层,丰富、完善学科理论体系,为促进图情学科在新时期蓬勃发展做贡献。[方法/过程]从学科研究范式视角切入,对哲学驱动和数据驱动两种不同的研究逻辑进行思辨性剖析与比较;并对科学评价领域开展案例分析。[结果/结论]未来图情学科研究,需哲学驱动与数据驱动并行,打通关键逻辑断层,避免"快餐式科研"与"理想型科研"。
[Purpose/significance]The field of library and information science in China is currently in the stage of functional transformation,and there are obvious differences in research paradigms,which has aroused extensive discussion.The research aims to fill the gap between philosophy and data,enriches and improves the theoretical system of the discipline,and contribute to the vigorous development of library and information science in the new era.[Method/process]From the perspective of discipline research paradigm,this paper made a critical analysis and comparison of two different research logics:philosophy driven and data driven;And the case analysis in the field of scientific evaluation was carried out.[Result/conclusion]In the future,the research of library and information science should be driven by philosophy and data simultaneously,so that break through the key logic fault,and avoid‘fast-food style research’and‘ideal research’.
作者
张洋
朱嘉麒
王媛媛
侯剑华
Zhang Yang;Zhu Jiaqi;Wang Yuanyuan;Hou Jianhua(School of Information Management,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510006)
出处
《图书情报工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第12期20-26,共7页
Library and Information Service
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"我国科技人才评价理论、方法体系与实现机制的创新研究"(研究项目:20BTQ085)研究成果之一。
关键词
学科建设
研究范式
研究逻辑
哲学驱动
数据驱动
图书情报
科学评价
discipline construction
research paradigm
research logic
philosophical driven
data driven paradigm
library and information science
scientific evaluation
作者简介
张洋(ORCID:0000-0002-6442-3593),教授;朱嘉麒(ORCID:0000-0001-6390-9236),博士研究生;王媛媛(ORCID:0000-0003-0288-9053),博士研究生;通讯作者:侯剑华(ORCID:0000-0001-7080-7131),教授,E-mail:houjh5@mail.sysu.edu.cn。
