期刊文献+

修正休克指数和支架覆盖表面积对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉介入术中无复流的影响 被引量:3

Influence of modified shock index and stent coverage surface area on no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨修正休克指数(modified shock index,MSI)和支架覆盖表面积(stent coverage surface area,SCSA)对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST-elevation myocardial infarction,STEMI)患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)术中发生无复流现象(no-reflow phenomenon,NRP)的影响。方法:选择2018年6月至2019年6月复旦大学附属中山医院收治的行急诊PCI术的STEMI患者231例。根据PCI过程中梗死相关动脉TIMI血流分级,将患者分为NRP组(TIMI 0~2级,n=48)和正常血流组(TIMI 3级,n=183)。以有创监测的心率与收缩压或平均动脉压比值计算休克指数(shock index,SI)或修正休克指数(modified SI,MSI);以支架直径(D支架)、长度与圆周率的乘积计算SCSA。对NRP的危险因素进行多因素logistic回归分析。结果:与正常血流组相比,NRP组患者年龄更大,糖尿病史、Killip分级为Ⅲ/Ⅳ级的比例更高,收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压降低;SBP<100 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)患者比例、SI、MSI、D支架和SCSA增大(P<0.05)。NRP组患者预后较差,院内死亡率明显高于正常血流组(6.3%vs 0.5%,P=0.030)。MSI≥1.2、SI≥0.7和SBP<100 mmHg时,患者发生NRP危险度分别是3.365、3.025和2.957(P<0.05);SCSA≥350 mm2和D支架>3.0 mm时,患者发生NRP的危险度为2.836和2.138(P<0.05)。结论:MSI≥1.2和SCSA≥350 mm2是急性STEMI患者PCI术中NRP发生的独立危险因素,NRP患者院内死亡率高。 Objective:To explore the influence of the modified shock index(MSI)and stent coverage surface area(SCSA)on the no-reflow phenomenon(NRP)in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods:A total of 231 STEMI patients who underwent emergency PCI were enrolled in Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University from June 2018 to June 2019.According to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)blood flow grading of infarct-associated artery during PCI,the patients were divided into NRP group(TIMI grade 0-2,n=48)and normal flow group(TIMI grade 3,n=183).The heart rate(HR),systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),and mean arterial pressure(MAP)at the beginning of PCI were recorded,and shock index(SI)or modified SI(MSI)was calculated by the ratio of HR and SBP or MAP.The mean diameter(D)and total length(L)of all implanted stents were recorded,and SCSA was calculated as formulaπ×D×L.The related factors of NRP were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.Results:Compared with the normal blood flow group,age,history of diabetes ratio,and Killip gradeⅢ/Ⅳratio in the NRP group increased significantly,the SBP,DBP,and MAP were significantly decreased,and the SI,MSI,D,and SCSA were significantly increased(all P<0.05).Patients with NRP were associated with poor prognosis,and in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the NRP group than that in the normal blood flow group(6.3%vs 0.5%,P=0.030).When MSI≥1.2,SI≥0.7,and SBP<100 mmHg,the odds ratio to predicate NRP risk were 3.365,3.025,and 2.957,respectively(P<0..05).Similarly,when SCSA≥350 mm^(2) and D>3.0 mm,the odds ratio to predicate NRP risk were 2.836 and 2.138(P<0.05).Conclusions:MSI≥1.2 and SCSA≥350 mm^(2) maybe independent risk factors for NRP in patients with primary STEMI undergoing PCI,and the patients with NRP have high in-hospital mortality.
作者 夏妍 卢淡泊 陈章炜 陈傲 王尹曼 钱菊英 葛均波 XIA Yan;LU Dan-bo;CHEN Zhang-wei;CHEN Ao;WANG Yin-man;QIAN Ju-ying;GE Jun-bo(Department of Cardiology,Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases,National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicinec,Shanghai 200032,China)
出处 《中国临床医学》 2021年第2期185-191,共7页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(81800347,81970295).
关键词 急性心肌梗死 冠状动脉介入治疗 无复流现象 修正休克指数 支架覆盖表面积 acute myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention no-reflow phenomenon modified shock index stent coverage surface area
作者简介 夏妍,博士,住院医师.E-mail:xia.yan@zs-hospital.sh.cn;通讯作者:钱菊英.Tel:021-64041990,E-mail:qian.juying@zs-hospital.sh.cn。
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献116

共引文献6403

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部