期刊文献+

化学发光分析仪检测乙型肝炎病毒血清标志物的性能分析 被引量:1

Performance Analysis of Chemiluminescence Analyzer for Detecting Hepatitis B Virus Serum Markers
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究化学发光分析仪在检测乙型肝炎病毒标志物中的性能。方法:取本院2018年1月~2018年12月收治的确诊乙型肝炎患者80例为研究对象,随机均分成对照组和观察组各40例,对照组给予ELISA法检测病毒五项标志物,观察组给予雅培i2000化学发光分析仪测病毒五项标志物。对比检测准确率。结果:两种方法检测后HBsAb符合32例,符合率80%,HBeAb符合33例,符合率82.5%、HBcAb符合37例,符合率92.5%,HBsAg符合35例,符合率87.5%,HBeAg符合率35例为87.5%。观察组明显优于对照组,且数据差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:化学发光分析仪检测乙肝标志物的准确率高于ELISA法,且操作方便,误诊率低。 Objective:To study the performance of chemiluminescence analyzer in detecting hepatitis B virus markers.Methods:80 cases of confirmed hepatitis B patients admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2018 were selected as the research objects,and they were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group with 40 cases each.The control group was given ELISA method to detect five virus markers,the observation group gave the Abbott i2000 chemiluminescence analyzer to measure five markers of the virus.Compare the detection accuracy rate.Results:After the two methods,32 cases of HBsAb were in line with a coincidence rate of 80%,33 cases of HBeAb were in line with a coincidence rate of 82.5%,37 cases of HBcAb were in line with a coincidence rate of 92.5%,and 35 cases of HBsAg were in line with a coincidence rate of 87.5%.The coincidence rate of HBeAg was 87.5%.35 cases were 87.5%.The observation group was significantly better than the control group,and the data difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The chemiluminescence analyzer is more accurate in detecting hepatitis B markers than the ELISA method.It is easy to operate and has a low misdiagnosis rate.
作者 孔玲 KONG Ling(Laboratory for Disease Control and Prevention,Dashiqiao Health Affairs Center,Liaoning Yingkou 115100)
出处 《中国医疗器械信息》 2021年第8期49-49,160,共2页 China Medical Device Information
关键词 化学发光分析仪 雅培i2000 ELISA法 乙型肝炎病毒 血清标志物 chemiluminescence analyzer Abbott i2000 ELISA method hepatitis B virus serum marker
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1李自生,刘轶群,周健.两种方法对比检测乙型肝炎5项血清学指标[J].检验医学与临床,2007,4(4):272-273. 被引量:8
  • 2Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Method comparison and bias estimation using patio samples[S]. Approved Guide line. CLSI,EP9-A. 2005.
  • 3Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. EP5-A2 Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods[S]. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI, 2004.
  • 4Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. EP9-A2 Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples[S]. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI, 2002.
  • 5Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. EP6-A2 Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures[S]. Wayne, PA,USA: CLSI, 2003.
  • 6Kim H, Oh EJ, Kang MS, et al. Comparison of the Abbot Architect i2000 assay, the Roche Mudular Analytics El70 assay, and an immunoradiometric assay for serum hepatitis B virus markers [J]. Ann Clin Lab Sci, 2007, 37(3):256-259.
  • 7Chen Y, Wu W, Li L J, et al. Comparison of the results for three automated immumoassay systems in determining serum HBV markers [J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2006, 372(1-2): 129-133.
  • 8高华,王勇,邹建文,范卫华.ROCH cobas e 601和ADVIA Centaur XP测定结果可比性研究[J].医学检验与临床,2010(5):86-88. 被引量:2
  • 9黄翠波.两台全自动电化学发光分析仪测定结果的比对评估[J].检验医学与临床,2012,9(6):729-730. 被引量:4
  • 10韩静,杨桂花,胡梅.不同仪器间5项检测结果的一致性比较[J].检验医学与临床,2012,9(9):1029-1031. 被引量:7

共引文献5

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部