期刊文献+

阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的临床疗效 被引量:5

Clinical efficacy of apatinib combined with S-1 in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探究阿帕替尼联合替吉奥胶囊治疗晚期复发转移食管癌患者的疗效。方法选择2017年1月至2019年1月于山东省泰安市肿瘤防治院就诊的140例晚期食管癌患者作为研究对象,采用随机数表法将患者随机分为观察组(72例)和对照组(68例),观察组给予阿帕替尼联合替吉奥化疗,对照组仅给予替吉奥化疗,观察两组患者近远期疗效及不良反应。结果观察组客观缓解率为38.9%(28/72),明显优于对照组的22.1%(15/68),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.655,P=0.031);观察组疾病控制率为88.9%(64/72),明显优于对照组的61.8%(42/68),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=13.993,P<0.001)。观察组和对照组中位无进展生存期分别为5.9个月、2.7个月,中位总生存期分别为14.8个月、7.9个月,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.477,P=0.026;χ^(2)=6.083,P=0.014)。两组患者不良反应均较轻,为1~2级,主要有乏力、白细胞减少、手足综合征、高血压、蛋白尿,观察组发生率分别为59.7%(43/72)、50.0%(36/72)、8.3%(6/72)、12.5%(9/72)、9.7%(7/72),对照组发生率分别为51.5%(35/68)、57.4%(39/68)、17.6%(12/68)、4.4%(3/68)、4.4%(3/68),两组比较差异均无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.965,P=0.326;χ^(2)=0.760,P=0.383;χ^(2)=2.708,P=0.100;χ^(2)=2.919,P=0.088;χ^(2)=0.794,P=0.373)。结论阿帕替尼联合替吉奥对复发转移食管癌治疗疗效较好,安全性及耐受性可。 Objective To explore the efficacy of apatinib combined with S-1 capsule in the treatment of patients with advanced recurrent and metastatic esophageal cancer.Methods A total of 140 patients with advanced esophageal cancer were selected as test subjects from January 2017 to January 2019 in Shandong Tai'an Cancer Prophylaction-Therapeutic Hospital.These patients were randomly divided into observation group(72 cases)and control group(68 cases)using random number table method.The patients in the observation group were treated with oral apatinib combined with S-1 chemotherapy,and the patients in the control group was only given S-1 chemotherapy.The short-term and long-term efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed.Results The objective remission rates of the observation group was 38.9%(28/72),higher than that in the control group(22.1%,15/68),with a statistically significant difference(χ^(2)=4.655,P=0.031).The disease control rate of the observation group was 88.9%(64/72),higher than that in the control group(61.8%,42/68),and there was a significant difference between the two groups(χ^(2)=13.993,P<0.001).The median progression-free survival of the observation group and the control group was 5.9 months and 2.7 months respectively,the median overall survival was 14.8 months and 7.9 months respectively,and there were significant differences between the two groups(χ^(2)=5.477,P=0.026;χ^(2)=6.083,P=0.014).The adverse reactions of the two groups were mild,grade 1-2,mainly including fatigue,leukopenia,hand-foot syndrome,hypertension and proteinuria,with incidences of 59.7%(43/72),50.0%(36/72),8.3%(6/72),12.5%(9/72),9.7%(7/72)in the observation group,and 51.5%(35/68),57.4%(39/68),17.6%(12/68),4.4%(3/68),4.4%(3/68)in the control group,there were no significant differences between the two groups(χ^(2)=0.965,P=0.326;χ^(2)=0.760,P=0.383;χ^(2)=2.708,P=0.100;χ^(2)=2.919,P=0.088;χ^(2)=0.794,P=0.373).Conclusion Apatinib combined with S-1 is effective,safe and tolerable in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic esophageal cancer.
作者 张雪伟 苏培英 彭雷 卢鑫 袁磊 高玉娟 Zhang Xuewei;Su Peiying;Peng Lei;Lu Xin;Yuan Lei;Gao Yujuan(Third Department of Radiation Oncology,Shandong Tai'an Cancer Prophylaction-Therapeutic Hospital,Tai'an 271000,China)
出处 《国际肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2021年第1期30-34,共5页 Journal of International Oncology
关键词 食管肿瘤 治疗结果 阿帕替尼 替吉奥 Esophageal neoplasms Treatment outcome Apatinib S-1
作者简介 通讯作者:苏培英,E-mail:sdsupeiying8498607@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献133

  • 1刘淑英,王晓稼.贝伐单抗在肿瘤治疗中相关毒副反应[J].肿瘤学杂志,2009,15(12):1133-1135. 被引量:3
  • 2胡大一,刘梅林,郭艺芳.老年高血压的诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2011版)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(2):31-39. 被引量:102
  • 3Yi-Fu He,Chu-Shu Ji,Bing Hu,Ping-Sheng Fan,Chang-Lu Hu,Feng-Shou Jiang,Jian Chen,Lei Zhu,Yi-Wei Yao,Wei Wang.A phase Ⅱ study of paclitaxel and nedaplatin as front-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(35):5910-5916. 被引量:16
  • 4王金万,孙燕,刘永煜,于起涛,张沂平,李凯,朱允中,周清华,侯梅,管忠震,李维廉,庄武,王东林,梁后杰,秦凤展,卢辉山,刘晓晴,孙红,张燕军,王杰军,罗素霞,杨瑞合,涂远荣,王秀问,宋恕平,周静敏,游丽芬,王竞,姚晨.重组人血管内皮抑素联合NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC随机、双盲、对照、多中心Ⅲ期临床研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2005,8(4):283-290. 被引量:628
  • 5张湘茹,孙燕.新抗肿瘤药长春花碱[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2003:341.
  • 6Hayashi K, Ando N, Watanabe H, et al. Phase II evanlu- ation of protracted infusion of eisplatin and 5-fluoroura- cil in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esopha- gus: a Japan Esophageal Ontology Group (JEOG) Trial (JCOG9407)[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2001, 31(9): 419-423.
  • 7Bleiberg H, Conroy T, Paillot B, et al. Randomised phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) ver- sus cisplatin alone in advanced squamous cell oesopha- geal cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer, 1997, 33(8): 1216-1220.
  • 8Huang J, Zhou Y, Zhang H, et al. A phase II study of bi- weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy for recur- rent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: ERCC1 expression predicts response to chemotherapy [J]. Med Oncol, 2013, 30(1): 343.
  • 9Burkart C, Bokemeyer C, Klump B, et al. A phase II tri- al of weekly irinotecan in cisplatin-refractory esophageal cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2007, 27(4C): 2845-2848.
  • 10Akutsu Y, Kono T, Uesato M, et al. S-1 monotherapy as second- or third-line chemotherapy for unresectable and recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Ontol- ogy, 2013, 84(5): 305-310.

共引文献585

同被引文献55

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部