摘要
在对时间的理解方面,爱因斯坦与柏格森存在本质分歧。分歧主要体现为:柏格森认为存在基于直觉的哲学时间,爱因斯坦则认为并不存在此种时间。以1922年4月6日爱因斯坦在巴黎做学术报告为契机,柏格森与爱因斯坦展开了影响深远的“时间之争”。这场争论在柏格森方面吸引了包括梅洛-庞蒂和德勒兹在内的一大批支持者,在爱因斯坦方面吸引了包括卡西尔和罗素在内的一大批支持者,双方围绕对时间的不同理解,延续、深化了这次争论。进一步来看,“时间之争”引发的问题中最为根本的乃是现代哲学与自然科学的关系问题。“时间之争”不仅是哲学与物理学的时间观之争,也是理性与直觉这两种根本的认知方式之争,甚至是人文文化与科学文化之争。
In understanding time,Albert Einstein and Henri Bergson diverged essentially.The main difference was that Bergson thought there was a philosophical time based on intuition,while Einstein thought there was no such time.Taking the academic report delivered by Albert Einstein on 6,April 1922 as an opportunity,Bergson and Einstein engaged in a far-reaching"Time Debate"in Paris.The debate drew a large crowd of supporters on Bergson's side,including Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Gilles Deleuze,and on Einstein's side,including Ernst Cassirer and Bertrand Russell.Moreover,the most fundamental issue raised from the"Time Debate"is the relationship between modern philosophy and natural science.The"Time Debate"is not only the debate between philosophy and physics on time concept,but also the debate between the two fundamental cognitive modes of rationality and intuition,and even the debate between humanistic culture and scientific culture.
作者
陈强强
CHEN Qiang-qiang(School of Marxism,Xizang Minzu University,Xianyang,Shaanxi 712082,China)
出处
《长沙理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第2期23-31,共9页
Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology：Social Science
基金
藏秦喜马拉雅·人才发展计划青年骨干教师项目(藏民大发2018〔23〕号)。
关键词
爱因斯坦
柏格森
时间
理性
直觉
Albert Einstein
Henri Bergson
time
reason
intuition
作者简介
陈强强(1988-),男,陕西清涧人,讲师,主要从事科技哲学与科技史研究。
