期刊文献+

多属性健康效用量表研制与应用述评 被引量:9

Review of Development and Application of Multi-attribute Utility Instruments
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际上常采用间接测量法中的多属性健康效用量表测量健康效用值,但国际通用的6种主要的多属性健康效用量表在我国的应用仍相对较少。随着中国的卫生技术评估方法在卫生决策领域发挥着愈加重要的作用,选择合适的普适性多属性健康效用量表来测量健康效用值将成为卫生技术评估研究和应用的基础。文章在简述直接测量法及其应用情况基础上,重点介绍国际上已开发应用的6种主要的普适性多属性健康效用量表,并简述其在国内外的应用现状和前景,这将为中国开展卫生经济学评价研究,尤其是效用值测量与成本-效用分析提供参考与借鉴。 Multi-attribute utility(MAU)instruments were commonly used to measure the health utility value internationally.However,among 6 most-widely used MAU instruments,except for the EQ-5 D,others were seldom used in China.As the health technology assessment played an increasingly important role in the field of health decision-making,choosing a suitable generic preference-based instruments to measure health utility was a crucial step.There was no review of development and application of MAU instruments so far.It first briefly described the direct health state utility measurement approaches and followed by focusing on the six MAU instruments that have been developed and widely applied internationally.Finally,it briefly described the application and its future of 6 MAU instruments globally.It aims to provide basic support for domestic health economic evaluation,especially for health utility measurement and cost-utility analysis.
作者 李顺平 吴晶 陈钢 LI Shun-ping;WU Jing;CHEN Gang(Centre for Health Management and Policy Research,School of Public Health,Cheeloo College of Medicine,Shandong University;NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research(Shandong University),Jinan,250012,China;不详)
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2020年第10期5-8,共4页 Chinese Health Economics
关键词 多属性健康效用量表 健康效用值 成本-效用分析 卫生技术评估 述评 multi-attribute utility instrument health state utility cost-utility analysis health technology assessment comment
作者简介 李顺平(1976-),男,博士学位,教授,研究方向:健康偏好测量与卫生技术评估,E-mail:lishunping@sdu.edu.cno。
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献38

  • 1顾海,李洪超.药物经济学成本-效果分析应用的相关问题探讨[J].中国药房,2004,15(11):674-676. 被引量:122
  • 2蔡华波,姜敏敏,李鲁.QWB在临床健康体检中的调查研究[J].全科医学临床与教育,2006,4(4):307-310. 被引量:4
  • 3王诗华,谭永红,吴雪钗.评述国内5年以来的药物经济学研究论文[J].华西医学,2007,22(3):463-464. 被引量:24
  • 4Bossert,W.,On intra-and interpersonal utility comparisons,Social Choice and Welfare[J].Soc Choice Welfare,1991,3(8):207-219.
  • 5Torrance G,W.,Feeny D.,Furlong W.,Visual analog scales,do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health state[J].Medical Decision Making,2001,21(1):329-34.
  • 6Lenert L,A.,The reliability and internal consistency of an lntemetcapable computer program fur measuring utilities[J],Quality of life Research,2001,9(7):811-817.
  • 7Rosser P.L.,Littenberg B.,Fearn P.,et al.,Paper standard gamble,a paper-based measure of standard gamble utility fur current health[J],International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,2003,19(1):135-29.
  • 8Dolan P.,Gudex C.,Kind P.,Willians A.,The time trade-off method,results from a general population study[J],Health Economics,1996,5(2):141-54.
  • 9Brazier J.,Roberts J.,Deverill M.,The estimation of a preferencebased measure of health from the SF-36[J],Journal of Health Economics,2002,21 (2):271-92.
  • 10Brook R.,with the EuroQol Group,EuroQol,the current state of play[J],Health Policy,1996,37(1):53-72.

共引文献78

同被引文献76

引证文献9

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部