期刊文献+

扬子陆块早奥陶世末期—中奥陶世Darriwilian初期沉积分异 被引量:49

SEDIMENTARY DIFFERENTIATION DURING THE LATEST EARLY ORDOVICIAN—EARLIEST DARRIWILIAN IN THE YANGTZE BLOCK
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究表明 ,扬子陆块早奥陶世末期至中奥陶世 Darriwilian初期各类沉积呈明显带状分布 ,但南北两侧沉积带分布并不对称。各沉积带总体走向为南西—北东向 ,不同阶段沉积带类型及位置略有变化。自古陆向东南方向 ,早奥陶世末期—中奥陶世初期依次发育近岸砂砾质沉积带 ,近岸砂质、泥质沉积带 ;内陆架泥质夹碳酸盐沉积带 ;浅外陆架碳酸盐夹泥质沉积带 ,含铁泥质碳酸盐沉积带 ,边缘碳酸盐沉积带 ;深外陆架斜坡泥质夹砂质、碳酸盐沉积带 ,泥质夹粉砂质沉积带 ,泥质、碳质沉积带。中奥陶世早期至 Darriwilian初期演变为近岸白云质与陆源碎屑沉积带 ;内陆架碳酸盐与泥、砂质沉积带 ;浅外陆架碳酸盐夹泥质沉积带 ,含铁泥质碳酸盐沉积带 ,边缘碳酸盐沉积带 ;深外陆架斜坡泥质夹砂质、碳酸盐沉积带 ,泥质夹粉砂质沉积带 ,泥质、碳质沉积带。扬子陆块北缘早奥陶世末期—中奥陶世初期发育浅外陆架粉砂质、泥质、碳酸盐沉积带 ,边缘碳酸盐沉积带 ;中奥陶世早期至 Darriwilian初期则包括浅外陆架碳酸盐沉积带 ,粉砂质、泥质 ,外陆架碳酸盐沉积带 。 Based on new chronostratigraphic framework and revised stratigraphic correlation(Table 1), the present paper deals with the sedimentary differentiation of latest Early Ordovician—earliest Darriwilian in the Yangtze Block. According to rock associations and sedimentary features, 9 sedimentary belts are recognized from the old lands southeastward toward the basin during the latest Early—earliest Middle Ordovician (Fig.1), namely: nearshore sand and gravel belt, nearshore sand and mud belt; inner shelf mud carbonate belt; shallower outer shelf carbonate mud belt, ferruginous and argillaceous carbonate belt, marginal carbonate belt; daeper outer shelf mud sand carbonate belt, mud silt belt and argillite carbonaceous shale belt. During the early Middle Ordovician—earliest Darriwilian, most of the sedimentary belts (Fig.2) developed formerly on the outer shelf and the slope remained their geographical positions. However, there were two, instead of three, sedimentary belts occurred in shallow sites; the inner shelf one is characterized by the dominance of carbonate sediments mixed with argillaceous and sandy intercalations. In addition, dolomitic deposits and terrigenous detrital sediments became dominant in the nearshore region. On the northern side of the Yangtze Block proper, three sedimentary belts can be recognized especially during the early Middle Ordovician—earliest Darriwilian. The shallower outer shelf carbonates outcrop only at Hexian, Anhui; the outershelf argillaceous, silty, and carbonate sediments were mainly developed at Mianxian and Susong; the marginal carbonate belt extends approximately from Chuxian to Hongze. It is interesting to note that deeper water sedimentary belts are only incompletely preserved on the northerm side, and a plausible explanation is that they were partially consumed by the later tectonic movements. The distribution pattern of sedimentary belts on the either side of the Yangtze Block is asymmetrical. The south side is thought to be a gentle slope, and the northern side could be a steeper, narrower shelf. Because the Ordovician is largely covered by the Quaternary in the Lower Yangtze area and only a little detailed stratigraphic information is available so far, the extending of the sedimentary belts in this area is just tentatively suggested. Further work is required to connect the corresponding sedimentary belts between the Lowere Yangtze area and the Middle and Upper Yangtze area.
出处 《地层学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2002年第4期302-304,共3页 Journal of Stratigraphy
基金 国家基金委特殊学科人才培养基金 南京地质古生物研究所创新基金 中国科学院古生物与古人类学科基础研究特别支持费(980 3 0 3 ) 国家自然科学基金 (No.49772 0 87 No.49872 0 0 5 No.4990 2 0 0 1) 国家重点基础研究专项经费 (G2 0 0 0 0 7770 0 )资助
关键词 沉积环境 奥陶纪 扬子陆块 碳酸岩沉积带 沉积模式 sedimentary belt, sedimentary environment, Ordovician, the Yangtze Block
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1王志浩,S.M.伯格斯特龙.华南奥陶系达瑞威尔阶底界附近的牙形刺[J].微体古生物学报,1999,16(4):325-350. 被引量:24
  • 2任纪舜 姜春发.中国大地构造及其演化[M].北京:科学出版社,1980.1-124.
  • 3湖北省地质矿产局.湖北省岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1996.164-181.
  • 4卢衍豪 朱兆玲 等.中国奥陶纪的生物地层和古动物地理.南京地质古生物研究所集刊,第七号[M].,1976..
  • 5安太痒.中国南部早古生代牙形石[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1987..
  • 6四川省地质矿产局.四川省岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997..
  • 7赖才根 黄枝高 等.陕南川北奥陶系再研究.地层古生物论文集[M].北京:地质出版社,1990,23.1-36.
  • 8中南地区区域地层表编写小组.中南地区区域地层表[M].北京:地质出版社,1974.1-533.
  • 9曾庆銮 赖才根 等.奥陶系.长江三峡地区生物地层学(2),早古生代分册[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.43-142.
  • 10陈旭 中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所.奥陶系.中国地层研究二十年(1979-1999)[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2000..

二级参考文献28

  • 1陈敏娟,张建华.皖南石台地区奥陶系牙形刺[J].微体古生物学报,1989,6(3):213-228. 被引量:21
  • 2王志浩,伯.,SM.中国奥陶纪牙形刺分区和生物地层[J].古生物学报,1996,35(1):26-59. 被引量:45
  • 3[30]Hoffman D F, 1991. Did the breakout of Laurentia turn Gondwanaland inside-out? Science, 232: 1406- 1412.
  • 4[31]Li Xing-xue, 1986. The mixed Permian Cathaysia-Gondwana flora. The Palaeobatanist, 35(2): 211-222.
  • 5[32]McMenamin M A S & McMenamin D L S. 1990. The emergence of Animals, The Cambrian breakthrough. New York: Columbia University Press, 1-217.
  • 6[33]Mckerrow W S & Scotese C R, 1990. Palaeozoic palaeogeography and Biogeography. London: The Geological Society. 1- 435.
  • 7安太庠,石油学报,1982年,4卷,1页
  • 8安太庠,中国的奥陶系,1982年,46-67,213-322页
  • 9安太庠,中国微体古生物学会第一次学术会议论文选集,1981年,105页
  • 10Zhang Jianhua,Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis,1998年,46卷,1页

共引文献150

同被引文献747

引证文献49

二级引证文献293

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部