摘要
在唐初孔颖达等人修纂的《五经正义》中,屡见征引"定本"以校勘文字的现象,其中以《毛诗正义》《春秋左传正义》及《礼记正义》三者最多。针对这一现象,自清迄今的学者展开了不同程度的讨论,认为"定本"或为唐初颜师古所定《五经定本》,或为六朝定本。对《礼记正义》所征引"定本"的29处校勘文字进行深入分析,可以认为孔颖达《礼记正义》中所征引的"定本"大部分为颜师古所定之本,少量为删汰皇侃、熊安生未尽之六朝旧定本。
It was a very common phenomenon that the"definitive edition"was quoted for proofreading in Wujing Zhengyi compiled by Kong Yinda and others in the early Tang Dynasty,most frequently in Maoshi Zhengyi,Chunqiu Zuozhuan Zhengyi and Liji Zhengyi.Consequently,scholars from the Qing Dynasty to now have made extensive discussions in various degrees,assuming that the"definitive edition"either referred to the Wujing Dingben by Yan Shigu in the early Tang Dynasty or the definitive edition in the Six Dynasties.This paper takes the Liji Zhengyi as an individual case and conducted profound analysis in the 29 pieces of text proofreading with quotation to the"definitive edition".After researching on the relationship between Liji Zhengyi and Liuchao Jiushu and the edition of the quoted master copy,the author considered that most Kong Yinda’s quotations from the"definitive edition"in Liji Zhengyi were from the definitive edition of Yan Shigu,and a few were from the old abridged definitive edition of the Six Dynasties partly completed by Huang Kan and Xiong Ansheng.
出处
《文学与文化》
2020年第2期86-91,共6页
Literature and Culture Studies
关键词
《礼记正义》
定本
孔颖达
颜师古
Liji Zhengyi
Definitive Edition
Kong Yinda
Yan Shigu
作者简介
马琳,南开大学文学院博士研究生。
