摘要
以房抵债是一种新兴的交易模式,由此引起的纠纷呈现出复杂多样的类型,但立法的滞后与司法解释的局限,尚难给以房抵债纠纷的解决提供统一适用的标准,出现类似案情不同判决结果的现象,给司法实务工作带来困惑。结合最高人民法院会议纪要、判例、公报案例及指导性案例,对以房抵债协议效力的类案裁判以类型化思维将其进行分类研究,通过分门别类提出效力判断及纠纷处理思路,力求使以房抵债纠纷能获得更多法律或司法解释的支持,从而使以房抵债协议纠纷解决于法有据。
The housing-debt method is an emerging transaction mode,which has caused various kinds of disputes.Due to the hysteresis of legislation and the limitation of judicial interpretation,it is difficult to provide a unified applicable standard for the settlement of the housing-debt disputes.As a result,The phenomenon of similar cases with different judgment results brings confusion to judicial practice work.The author of this paper conducted a classified study on the housing-debt agreement and its validity with the typified thinking based on the minutes of meeting,judicial precedent and communique cases,and the guiding cases from the Supreme People's Court.The effectiveness judgment and ideas of dispute settlement were proposed in accordance with different categories.The author hopes that the housing-debt agreement can acquire more support from the laws and judicial interpretation to solve the disputes arising from the housing-debt agreement with lawfully recognized evidence.
作者
陈开梓
CHEN Kai-zi(School of Marxism, Ningde Normal University, Ningde 352100, China)
出处
《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第2期55-61,共7页
Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
基金
宁德师范学院2018年度校级专项项目(2018ZX107)。
关键词
以房抵债协议
类案裁判
类型化
债务清偿
于法有据
housing-debt agreement
similar case of judgment
categorization
redemption of debt
legal basis
作者简介
陈开梓(1968-),男,福建宁德人,宁德师范学院马克思主义学院副教授,主要从事马克思主义法学及民商法研究。
